vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BXP, Inc. (BXP) and Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BXP, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($872.1M vs $721.6M, roughly 1.2× Celsius Holdings, Inc.). BXP, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.3% vs 3.4%, a 11.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Celsius Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (117.2% vs 0.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.4% CAGR vs 1.3%).
BXP Inc., operating as Boston Properties, is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust focused on owning, managing and developing high-quality Class A commercial office properties across major U.S. metro markets, serving diverse corporate, tech and professional service tenants.
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is an American company that produces a range of fitness and energy drinks under the brand name Celsius. The company's products are marketed as healthy, to which the CEO attributes the brand's success.
BXP vs CELH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $872.1M | $721.6M |
| Net Profit | $133.0M | $24.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | 15.3% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.8% | 117.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 53.0% | 231.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.69 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $872.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $877.1M | $721.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $871.5M | $725.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.5M | $739.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $865.2M | $329.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $858.6M | $332.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $859.2M | $265.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $850.5M | $402.0M |
| Q1 26 | $133.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $248.4M | $24.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-121.7M | $-61.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $89.0M | $99.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.2M | $44.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-228.9M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.6M | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | $79.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 58.8% | 47.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 59.3% | 51.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.2% | 51.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.2% | 52.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | 50.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.5% | 46.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.8% | 52.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.4% |
| Q1 26 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.0% | -8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.7% | -5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 19.8% |
| Q1 26 | $1.69 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.56 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.77 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.56 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.39 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.46 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.53 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $0.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $512.8M | $398.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $676.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.7B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $25.1B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.57× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $512.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $398.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $861.1M | $806.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $447.0M | $615.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $398.1M | $977.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $890.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $903.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $685.4M | $903.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $676.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $870.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $871.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3B | $443.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $399.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $423.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8B | $415.8M |
| Q1 26 | $25.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.2B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.5B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-119.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-130.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -18.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -4.83× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $323.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $407.8M | $-119.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.2M | $331.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $353.1M | $43.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $210.0M | $103.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $383.7M | $75.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $286.1M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.1M | $39.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $362.7M | $-130.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $231.6M | $321.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $281.5M | $35.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.6M | $96.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $312.5M | $70.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $234.5M | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.4M | $30.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.6% | 44.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.4% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | 29.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.4% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.1% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | -4.83× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.97× | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.43× | 2.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.42× | 2.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.61× | 0.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BXP
| Lease | $818.2M | 94% |
| Parking and other | $30.8M | 4% |
| Development and management services | $9.2M | 1% |
CELH
Segment breakdown not available.
