vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BXP, Inc. (BXP) and Dynatrace, Inc. (DT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BXP, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($872.1M vs $515.5M, roughly 1.7× Dynatrace, Inc.). BXP, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.3% vs 7.8%, a 7.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dynatrace, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs 0.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Dynatrace, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.3% CAGR vs 1.3%).
BXP Inc., operating as Boston Properties, is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust focused on owning, managing and developing high-quality Class A commercial office properties across major U.S. metro markets, serving diverse corporate, tech and professional service tenants.
Dynatrace, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that provides an AI-powered observability platform. Their software is used to monitor, analyze, and optimize application performance, software development, cyber security practices, IT infrastructure, and user experience.
BXP vs DT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $872.1M | $515.5M |
| Net Profit | $133.0M | $40.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 81.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 14.1% |
| Net Margin | 15.3% | 7.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.8% | 18.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 53.0% | -88.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.69 | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $872.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $877.1M | $515.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $871.5M | $493.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.5M | $477.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $865.2M | $445.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $858.6M | $436.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $859.2M | $418.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $850.5M | $399.2M |
| Q1 26 | $133.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $248.4M | $40.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-121.7M | $57.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $89.0M | $48.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.2M | $39.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-228.9M | $361.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.6M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | $38.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 58.8% | 81.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 59.3% | 81.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.2% | 82.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.2% | 80.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | 81.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.5% | 81.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.8% | 81.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.5% |
| Q1 26 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.0% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.7% | 82.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | $1.69 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.56 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.77 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.56 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.39 | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.46 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.53 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $512.8M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.7B | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $25.1B | $4.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $512.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $861.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $447.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $398.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $685.4M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8B | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $25.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.5B | $3.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $33.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $27.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.84× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $465.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $407.8M | $33.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.2M | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $353.1M | $269.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $210.0M | $162.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $383.7M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $286.1M | $23.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.1M | $230.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $362.7M | $27.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $231.6M | $27.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $281.5M | $262.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.6M | $148.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $312.5M | $37.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $234.5M | $20.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.4M | $227.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.6% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.4% | 54.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.4% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.1% | 57.0% |
| Q1 26 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 0.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | 0.84× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.97× | 5.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.43× | 4.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.42× | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.61× | 5.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BXP
| Lease | $818.2M | 94% |
| Parking and other | $30.8M | 4% |
| Development and management services | $9.2M | 1% |
DT
| Subscription And Circulation | $493.4M | 96% |
| Services | $22.1M | 4% |
