vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BXP, Inc. (BXP) and National Vision Holdings, Inc. (EYE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BXP, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($872.1M vs $487.3M, roughly 1.8× National Vision Holdings, Inc.). BXP, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.3% vs 0.7%, a 14.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, National Vision Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.9% vs 0.8%). Over the past eight quarters, National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.6% CAGR vs 1.3%).
BXP Inc., operating as Boston Properties, is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust focused on owning, managing and developing high-quality Class A commercial office properties across major U.S. metro markets, serving diverse corporate, tech and professional service tenants.
Vision Research is an international company that manufactures high-speed digital cameras based in Wayne, New Jersey. Their cameras are marketed under the Phantom brand, and are used in a broad variety of industries including: defense, industrial product development, manufacturing, automotive, scientific research, and entertainment. Vision Research is a business unit of the Materials Analysis Division of Ametek Inc., a global manufacturer of electronic instruments and electromechanical devices.
BXP vs EYE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $872.1M | $487.3M |
| Net Profit | $133.0M | $3.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 2.0% |
| Net Margin | 15.3% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.8% | 7.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 53.0% | 139.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.69 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $872.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $877.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $871.5M | $487.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.5M | $486.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $865.2M | $510.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $858.6M | $437.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $859.2M | $451.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $850.5M | $451.7M |
| Q1 26 | $133.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $248.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-121.7M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $89.0M | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.2M | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-228.9M | $-28.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.6M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | $-3.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 58.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 59.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.7% | -6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | -0.7% |
| Q1 26 | $1.69 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.56 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.77 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.56 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.39 | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.46 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.53 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $512.8M | $56.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $236.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.7B | $858.8M |
| Total Assets | $25.1B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $512.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $861.1M | $56.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $447.0M | $48.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $398.1M | $80.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $73.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $81.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $685.4M | $179.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $236.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $255.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $244.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $248.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $252.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $143.9M |
| Q1 26 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $858.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $850.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3B | $836.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $816.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $840.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8B | $843.4M |
| Q1 26 | $25.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.5B | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.17× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $46.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $30.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 13.83× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $83.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $407.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.2M | $46.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $353.1M | $54.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $210.0M | $32.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $383.7M | $30.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $286.1M | $27.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.1M | $51.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $362.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $231.6M | $30.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $281.5M | $42.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.6M | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $312.5M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $234.5M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.4M | $31.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.6% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.4% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.4% | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.1% | 7.1% |
| Q1 26 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.97× | 6.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.43× | 2.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.42× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.61× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BXP
| Lease | $818.2M | 94% |
| Parking and other | $30.8M | 4% |
| Development and management services | $9.2M | 1% |
EYE
Segment breakdown not available.
