vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BXP, Inc. (BXP) and OLYMPIC STEEL INC (ZEUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BXP, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($872.1M vs $490.7M, roughly 1.8× OLYMPIC STEEL INC). BXP, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.3% vs 0.4%, a 14.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OLYMPIC STEEL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.4% vs 0.8%). Over the past eight quarters, BXP, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (1.3% CAGR vs 0.1%).
BXP Inc., operating as Boston Properties, is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust focused on owning, managing and developing high-quality Class A commercial office properties across major U.S. metro markets, serving diverse corporate, tech and professional service tenants.
Olympic Steel, Inc. is a metals service center based in Cleveland, Ohio. The company processes and distributes carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate steel, aluminium alloy, tin plate, and metal-intensive branded products primarily in the United States. Metals processing and value added services include tempering, stretch leveling, cutting-to-length, slitting, edging, shearing, blanking, burning, forming, shot blasting, laser punching, plate rolling, fabricating, machi...
BXP vs ZEUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $872.1M | $490.7M |
| Net Profit | $133.0M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 15.3% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.8% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 53.0% | -21.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.69 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $872.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $877.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $871.5M | $490.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.5M | $496.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $865.2M | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $858.6M | $418.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $859.2M | $470.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $850.5M | $526.3M |
| Q1 26 | $133.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $248.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-121.7M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $89.0M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.2M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-228.9M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.6M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | $7.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 58.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 59.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 1.5% |
| Q1 26 | $1.69 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.56 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.77 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.56 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.39 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.46 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.53 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $0.66 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $512.8M | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $240.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.7B | $579.1M |
| Total Assets | $25.1B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $512.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $861.1M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $447.0M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $398.1M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $685.4M | $9.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $240.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $233.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $235.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $272.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $209.2M |
| Q1 26 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $579.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $578.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3B | $574.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $573.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $570.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8B | $569.5M |
| Q1 26 | $25.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.5B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.37× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-12.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -2.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -2.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $407.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.2M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $353.1M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $210.0M | $49.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $383.7M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $286.1M | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.1M | $-2.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $362.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $231.6M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $281.5M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.6M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $312.5M | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $234.5M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.4M | $-11.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.6% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.1% | -2.2% |
| Q1 26 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.97× | 2.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.43× | 19.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.42× | 9.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.61× | -0.38× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BXP
| Lease | $818.2M | 94% |
| Parking and other | $30.8M | 4% |
| Development and management services | $9.2M | 1% |
ZEUS
| Carbon Flat Products | $268.2M | 55% |
| Specialty Metals Flat Products | $140.9M | 29% |
| Tubular And Pipe Products | $81.6M | 17% |
