vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BYLINE BANCORP, INC. (BY) and DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. (DDI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BYLINE BANCORP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($112.4M vs $83.0M, roughly 1.4× DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd.). BYLINE BANCORP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 33.4% vs 30.2%, a 3.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.7% vs 9.0%).
Byline Bank is a bank headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, United States. It is the primary subsidiary of Byline Bancorp, Inc., a bank holding company, and the 4th largest SBA 7(a) lender.
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.
BY vs DDI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $112.4M | $83.0M |
| Net Profit | $37.6M | $25.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 70.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 42.5% |
| Net Margin | 33.4% | 30.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.0% | 13.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 33.0% | -7.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.83 | $10.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $112.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.8M | $83.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.4M | $88.2M |
| Q1 26 | $37.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.3M | $25.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.7M | $33.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 70.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.3% | 42.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | 41.0% |
| Q1 26 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.8% | 30.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.9% | 37.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.83 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.77 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.82 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.66 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.64 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.68 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.69 | $10.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.68 | $13.39 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $198.4M | $372.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $37.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $815.5M |
| Total Assets | $9.9B | $879.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.05× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $198.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $149.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $218.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $421.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $563.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.6M | $372.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $730.5M | $339.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $37.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $36.0M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $815.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $786.2M |
| Q1 26 | $9.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4B | $879.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6B | $852.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $31.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $31.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 38.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.27× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $129.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $175.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.8M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.1M | $34.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $136.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $171.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $31.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.4M | $34.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 116.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 163.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | 38.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.7% | 39.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 0.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.06× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.78× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.65× | 1.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.35× | 1.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
