vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BYLINE BANCORP, INC. (BY) and Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (FLGT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BYLINE BANCORP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($112.4M vs $71.1M, roughly 1.6× Fulgent Genetics, Inc.). On growth, BYLINE BANCORP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.0% vs -3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, BYLINE BANCORP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (6.4% CAGR vs 0.1%).
Byline Bank is a bank headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, United States. It is the primary subsidiary of Byline Bancorp, Inc., a bank holding company, and the 4th largest SBA 7(a) lender.
Fulgent Genetics, Inc. is a molecular diagnostics technology firm that develops and offers genetic testing services including carrier screening, oncology testing, infectious disease detection, and hereditary condition analysis, serving clinical providers, pharma firms, research institutions and public health groups primarily in North America.
BY vs FLGT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $112.4M | $71.1M |
| Net Profit | $37.6M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 30.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 21.1% |
| Net Margin | 33.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 9.0% | -3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 33.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.83 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $112.4M | $71.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.0M | $83.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.7M | $84.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.5M | $81.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.1M | $73.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.7M | $76.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.8M | $71.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.4M | $71.0M |
| Q1 26 | $37.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.5M | $-23.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.2M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.1M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.2M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.3M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.3M | $-14.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.7M | $-8.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.1% | -43.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.1% | -18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.2% | -24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.4% | -26.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | -21.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.3% | -23.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | -26.6% |
| Q1 26 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | -28.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.1% | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.2% | -23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.4% | -15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | -7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.8% | -20.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.9% | -12.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.83 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.77 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.82 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.66 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.64 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.68 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.68 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $198.4M | $23.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | — |
| Total Assets | $9.9B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $198.4M | $23.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $149.1M | $50.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $117.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $218.3M | $87.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $421.3M | $67.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $563.1M | $55.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.6M | $58.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $730.5M | $65.1M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $9.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6B | $1.2B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
