vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BYLINE BANCORP, INC. (BY) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BYLINE BANCORP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($112.4M vs $93.7M, roughly 1.2× Ranpak Holdings Corp.). On growth, BYLINE BANCORP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.0% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Ranpak Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 6.4%).
Byline Bank is a bank headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, United States. It is the primary subsidiary of Byline Bancorp, Inc., a bank holding company, and the 4th largest SBA 7(a) lender.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
BY vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $112.4M | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | $37.6M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 33.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 9.0% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 33.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.83 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $112.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.0M | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.7M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.5M | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.1M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.7M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.8M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.4M | $72.8M |
| Q1 26 | $37.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.2M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.1M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.2M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.3M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.7M | $5.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.1% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.1% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.2% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.4% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.3% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | -7.1% |
| Q1 26 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.1% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.2% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.4% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.8% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.9% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.83 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.77 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.82 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.66 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.64 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.68 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.69 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.68 | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $198.4M | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $9.9B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $198.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $149.1M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $218.3M | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $421.3M | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $563.1M | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.6M | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $730.5M | $65.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $396.1M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $566.2M |
| Q1 26 | $9.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.3M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.3M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.3M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.1M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $175.2M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.8M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.1M | $19.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $136.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $171.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 116.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 163.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.06× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.78× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.35× | 3.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BY
Segment breakdown not available.
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
