vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BYLINE BANCORP, INC. (BY) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $112.4M, roughly 1.8× BYLINE BANCORP, INC.). BYLINE BANCORP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 33.4% vs 2.2%, a 31.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BYLINE BANCORP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.0% vs 5.2%). Over the past eight quarters, BYLINE BANCORP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (6.4% CAGR vs -3.3%).
Byline Bank is a bank headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, United States. It is the primary subsidiary of Byline Bancorp, Inc., a bank holding company, and the 4th largest SBA 7(a) lender.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
BY vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $112.4M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $37.6M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 33.4% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.0% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 33.0% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.83 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $112.4M | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.0M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.7M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.5M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.1M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.7M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.8M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.4M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | $37.6M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.5M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.2M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.1M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.2M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.3M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.3M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.7M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.1% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.2% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.4% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | 33.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.2% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.4% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.8% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.9% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.83 | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.77 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.82 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.66 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.64 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.68 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.69 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.68 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $198.4M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $9.9B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $198.4M | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $149.1M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $218.3M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $421.3M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $563.1M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.6M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $730.5M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $9.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6B | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.3M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.3M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.3M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.1M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $175.2M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.8M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.1M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $136.3M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.0M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.0M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $171.2M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.4M | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 116.5% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.8% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 163.5% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.7% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.06× | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.03× | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.78× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.65× | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.35× | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
