vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BOYD GAMING CORP (BYD) and Chemours Co (CC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chemours Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $997.4M, roughly 1.3× BOYD GAMING CORP). BOYD GAMING CORP runs the higher net margin — 10.5% vs -3.5%, a 14.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BOYD GAMING CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.6% vs -2.1%). Over the past eight quarters, BOYD GAMING CORP's revenue compounded faster (1.5% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Boyd Gaming Corporation is an American gambling and hospitality company based in Paradise, Nevada, US.
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
BYD vs CC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $997.4M | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $104.3M | $-47.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 11.7% |
| Operating Margin | 16.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | -3.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.6% | -2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -5.9% | -261.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.37 | $-0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $997.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $991.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $961.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $104.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.4M | $-47.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $46.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.5M | $-380.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.4M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $170.5M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $131.1M | $-32.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.8M | $60.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.8% |
| Q1 26 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | -15.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.1% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.9% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.5% | 4.4% |
| Q1 26 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 143.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | -23.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.2% | -0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 3.9% |
| Q1 26 | $1.37 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.60 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.81 | $0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.84 | $-2.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.31 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.89 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.43 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.47 | $0.39 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $670.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $250.0M |
| Total Assets | — | $7.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 16.40× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $353.4M | $670.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $319.1M | $613.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $320.1M | $502.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.5M | $464.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $316.7M | $713.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $286.3M | $596.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $280.8M | $604.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $250.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $274.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $228.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $566.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $571.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $643.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $714.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.6B | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6B | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5B | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.4B | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3B | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 16.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.96× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.56× | 17.99× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.61× | 7.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | 7.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.88× | 6.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.73× | 5.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $137.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $92.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $51.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $275.3M | $137.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $240.0M | $146.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $205.0M | $93.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $256.4M | $-112.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $262.1M | $138.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.2M | $139.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.1M | $-620.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.0M | $92.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.4M | $105.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.6M | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.5M | $-196.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.9M | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.0M | $63.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.7M | $-693.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | -14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.2% | -44.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.8% | 4.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.96× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.17× | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.76× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.52× | -10.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BYD
| Gaming | $650.5M | 65% |
| Online reimbursements | $135.4M | 14% |
| Food & beverage | $75.8M | 8% |
| Other | $63.5M | 6% |
| Room | $45.9M | 5% |
| Management fee | $26.2M | 3% |
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
