vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BOYD GAMING CORP (BYD) and F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $997.4M, roughly 1.8× BOYD GAMING CORP). BOYD GAMING CORP runs the higher net margin — 10.5% vs 7.3%, a 3.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.2% vs 0.6%). Over the past eight quarters, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (6.1% CAGR vs 1.5%).
Boyd Gaming Corporation is an American gambling and hospitality company based in Paradise, Nevada, US.
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. is a public company headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa. It primarily provides annuities, life insurance, and pension buyout services. The company was founded in 1959.
BYD vs FG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $997.4M | $1.8B |
| Net Profit | $104.3M | $128.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 16.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | 7.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.6% | 13.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -5.9% | -60.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.37 | $0.97 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $997.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $991.6M | $908.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $961.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $104.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.4M | $128.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.5M | $40.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.4M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $170.5M | $327.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $131.1M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.8M | $203.0M |
| Q1 26 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 143.4% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.2% | -2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 21.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 17.3% |
| Q1 26 | $1.37 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.60 | $0.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.81 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.84 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.31 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.89 | $2.53 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.43 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.47 | $1.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $4.8B |
| Total Assets | — | $98.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.47× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $353.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $319.1M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $320.1M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.5M | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $316.7M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $286.3M | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $280.8M | $3.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $3.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.6B | $98.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $96.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6B | $91.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5B | $88.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.4B | $85.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3B | $84.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3B | $78.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.56× | 0.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.61× | 0.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | 0.55× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.88× | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.73× | 0.56× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.13× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $275.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $240.0M | $937.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $205.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $256.4M | $956.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $262.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.1M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.96× | 9.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.17× | 7.94× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.35× | 40.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.54× | 4.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.76× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.52× | 5.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BYD
| Gaming | $650.5M | 65% |
| Online reimbursements | $135.4M | 14% |
| Food & beverage | $75.8M | 8% |
| Other | $63.5M | 6% |
| Room | $45.9M | 5% |
| Management fee | $26.2M | 3% |
FG
Segment breakdown not available.