vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Broadway Financial Corp (BYFC) and Identiv, Inc. (INVE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Broadway Financial Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.4M vs $6.2M, roughly 1.5× Identiv, Inc.). Broadway Financial Corp runs the higher net margin — 1934.0% vs -60.3%, a 1994.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Broadway Financial Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs -7.9%). Identiv, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.8M vs $-13.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Broadway Financial Corp's revenue compounded faster (9.7% CAGR vs -3.8%).
Virtu Financial, Inc. is an American high-frequency trading company. The company went public on the Nasdaq in 2015.
Identiv is a publicly traded Internet of Things technology company listed on the Nasdaq stock market.
BYFC vs INVE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.4M | $6.2M |
| Net Profit | $1.0M | $-3.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 18.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -76.4% |
| Net Margin | 1934.0% | -60.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | -7.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.8% | -948.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-0.17 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6M | $6.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.8M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.0M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.9M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $752.0K | $-6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.7M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $-355.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $516.0K | $85.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.0K | $-6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-154.0K | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -76.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -256.2% | -111.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.8% | -126.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -45.3% | -103.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | -98.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | -146.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | -99.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.9% | -76.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1934.0% | -60.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -264.2% | -68.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | -119.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.3% | -90.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.3% | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 1315.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | -92.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.0% | -68.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.86 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.00 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.39 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | $3.62 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.02 | $-0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.5M | $128.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $262.8M | $140.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $151.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.5M | $128.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.7M | $126.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.5M | $129.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.8M | $132.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $135.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.1M | $145.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.8M | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $67.1M | $21.6M |
| Q4 25 | $262.8M | $140.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.7M | $143.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $284.7M | $146.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $283.6M | $150.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $285.0M | $154.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $286.2M | $156.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $282.1M | $65.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $281.1M | $70.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $151.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $151.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $153.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $158.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $163.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $177.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $97.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $101.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $230.0K | $3.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-13.0K | $2.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 45.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.6% | 3.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.22× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.3M | $-7.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $230.0K | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.3M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8M | $-993.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.7M | $-1.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-13.0K | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.4M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.7M | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 45.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.1% | -64.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.0% | -75.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -52.4% | -68.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | -97.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.6% | -118.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 118.9% | -16.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -149.7% | -23.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.85× | -0.08× | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.21× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BYFC
Segment breakdown not available.
INVE
| Other | $3.4M | 55% |
| Europe And Middle East | $2.2M | 36% |
| Asia Pacific | $575.0K | 9% |