vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BEYOND MEAT, INC. (BYND) and Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Globalstar, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($72.0M vs $61.6M, roughly 1.2× BEYOND MEAT, INC.). On growth, Globalstar, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.6% vs -19.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Globalstar, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.9% CAGR vs -9.7%).
Beyond Meat, Inc., branded as Beyond, is a producer of plant-based meat alternatives founded in 2009 by Ethan Brown. The company's products were first launched in the United States in 2012.
Globalstar, Inc. is an American telecommunications company that operates a satellite constellation in low Earth orbit (LEO) for satellite phone, low-speed data transmission and Earth observation. The Globalstar second-generation constellation consists of 25 satellites.
BYND vs GSAT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $61.6M | $72.0M |
| Net Profit | — | $-11.6M |
| Gross Margin | -11.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -211.4% | -0.5% |
| Net Margin | — | -16.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -19.7% | 17.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 76.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.68 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $61.6M | $72.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.2M | $73.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $75.0M | $67.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $68.7M | $60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.7M | $61.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.0M | $72.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.2M | $60.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $75.6M | $56.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-110.7M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-29.2M | $19.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-52.9M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-50.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.6M | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-34.5M | $-9.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-54.4M | $-13.2M |
| Q4 25 | -11.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -211.4% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -160.0% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -46.6% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -81.8% | -14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -49.3% | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -38.2% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -36.4% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -70.7% | -8.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -16.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -157.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.0% | 28.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -77.0% | -28.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -82.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.8% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -37.0% | -16.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -71.9% | -23.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.68 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.44 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.69 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.65 | $-0.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.41 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.53 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.84 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $203.9M | $447.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $415.7M | $483.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-997.0K | $355.7M |
| Total Assets | $614.7M | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.36× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $203.9M | $447.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.3M | $346.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $103.5M | $308.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.1M | $241.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $131.9M | $391.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.7M | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.9M | $64.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $157.9M | $59.3M |
| Q4 25 | $415.7M | $483.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $508.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $491.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $502.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $511.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $394.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $393.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $398.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-997.0K | $355.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-784.1M | $364.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-677.0M | $360.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-649.5M | $344.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-601.2M | $358.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-611.9M | $394.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-590.0M | $383.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-561.4M | $377.1M |
| Q4 25 | $614.7M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $599.7M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $691.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $643.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $678.1M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $692.9M | $917.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $711.2M | $926.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $735.0M | $917.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-46.8M | $175.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-49.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -80.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-157.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-46.8M | $175.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-38.8M | $236.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-33.2M | $157.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-26.1M | $51.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-29.0M | $340.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.0M | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.0M | $36.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-31.8M | $29.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-49.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-41.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-35.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-30.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-35.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-33.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | -80.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -59.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -46.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -43.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 216.53× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BYND
Segment breakdown not available.
GSAT
| Services | $67.4M | 94% |
| Products | $4.6M | 6% |
