vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Blaize Holdings, Inc. (BZAI) and Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP (GHI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Blaize Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.8M vs $15.0M, roughly 1.6× Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP). Blaize Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -13.9% vs -38.9%, a 25.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Blaize Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2377500.0% vs -33.6%).
Blaize Holdings, Inc. is a technology company specializing in edge artificial intelligence computing solutions. It designs energy-efficient AI processors, low-latency inference software stacks, and end-to-end edge AI development tools, serving key segments including autonomous driving, industrial automation, smart cities, and edge healthcare monitoring.
Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP is a publicly traded real estate investment partnership focused on acquiring, owning, and managing affordable and workforce multifamily housing properties across the United States. It prioritizes investments that generate stable long-term returns while expanding housing access for low and middle income communities.
BZAI vs GHI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.8M | $15.0M |
| Net Profit | $-3.3M | $-5.8M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -89.8% | -33.4% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | -38.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 2377500.0% | -33.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.7% | -157.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | $-0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $23.8M | $15.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9M | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $25.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $22.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $22.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.3M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.3M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.6M |
| Q4 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -89.8% | -33.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -190.3% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 47.6% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | -38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -221.3% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 47.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.25 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $45.8M | $39.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $39.0M | — |
| Total Assets | $102.2M | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.8M | $39.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $36.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $51.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $37.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $56.3M |
| Q4 25 | $39.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $102.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-16.5M | $37.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-16.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -69.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-16.5M | $37.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.9M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-16.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -69.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -210.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
