vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Blaize Holdings, Inc. (BZAI) and LANDMARK BANCORP INC (LARK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Blaize Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.8M vs $18.8M, roughly 1.3× LANDMARK BANCORP INC). LANDMARK BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 27.0% vs -13.9%, a 40.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Blaize Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2377500.0% vs 14.0%).
Blaize Holdings, Inc. is a technology company specializing in edge artificial intelligence computing solutions. It designs energy-efficient AI processors, low-latency inference software stacks, and end-to-end edge AI development tools, serving key segments including autonomous driving, industrial automation, smart cities, and edge healthcare monitoring.
Landmark Bancorp Inc is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating Landmark National Bank, primarily serving communities across Kansas. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, residential mortgages, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, catering to individual consumers, small businesses and local mid-sized enterprises.
BZAI vs LARK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.8M | $18.8M |
| Net Profit | $-3.3M | $5.1M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -89.8% | — |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | 27.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 2377500.0% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.7% | 7.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.8M | $18.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9M | $18.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.3M | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.3M | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -89.8% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -190.3% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 34.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -221.3% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | $0.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.25 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.68 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $45.8M | $31.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $39.0M | — |
| Total Assets | $102.2M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $31.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $45.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $39.0M | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $155.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $148.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $136.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $139.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $128.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $102.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-16.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-16.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -69.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-16.5M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.9M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $439.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-16.5M | $21.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.9M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $354.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -69.6% | 112.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -210.2% | 55.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 75.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.45× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
