vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Blaize Holdings, Inc. (BZAI) and TANTECH HOLDINGS LTD (TANH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Blaize Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.8M vs $21.5M, roughly 1.1× TANTECH HOLDINGS LTD). TANTECH HOLDINGS LTD runs the higher net margin — 8.2% vs -13.9%, a 22.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Blaize Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2377500.0% vs -0.2%).
Blaize Holdings, Inc. is a technology company specializing in edge artificial intelligence computing solutions. It designs energy-efficient AI processors, low-latency inference software stacks, and end-to-end edge AI development tools, serving key segments including autonomous driving, industrial automation, smart cities, and edge healthcare monitoring.
Tantech Holdings Ltd is a China-based specialty manufacturing enterprise focused on R&D, production and distribution of bamboo-derived carbon products, high-performance clean energy materials and eco-friendly consumer goods, serving customers across Chinese and global markets in consumer goods, industrial materials and new energy segments.
BZAI vs TANH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.8M | $21.5M |
| Net Profit | $-3.3M | $1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | 22.2% |
| Operating Margin | -89.8% | 10.8% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | 8.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 2377500.0% | -0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.7% | 59.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $23.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $21.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.3% |
| Q4 25 | -89.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -190.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.0% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -221.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.25 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $45.8M | $35.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $39.0M | $128.3M |
| Total Assets | $102.2M | $143.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $35.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $34.2M |
| Q4 25 | $39.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $128.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $126.0M |
| Q4 25 | $102.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $143.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $142.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-16.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-16.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -69.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-16.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-16.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.4M |
| Q4 25 | -69.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -210.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BZAI
Segment breakdown not available.
TANH
| Revenue from China | $20.9M | 97% |
| Revenue directly from foreign countries | $602.2K | 3% |
