vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Blaize Holdings, Inc. (BZAI) and Venus Concept Inc. (VERO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Blaize Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.8M vs $13.8M, roughly 1.7× Venus Concept Inc.). Blaize Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -13.9% vs -163.8%, a 149.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Blaize Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2377500.0% vs -8.2%). Venus Concept Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-4.9M vs $-16.5M).
Blaize Holdings, Inc. is a technology company specializing in edge artificial intelligence computing solutions. It designs energy-efficient AI processors, low-latency inference software stacks, and end-to-end edge AI development tools, serving key segments including autonomous driving, industrial automation, smart cities, and edge healthcare monitoring.
Venus Concept Inc is a global medical technology firm specializing in the development, manufacturing, and distribution of non-invasive and minimally invasive aesthetic medical devices. Its product portfolio covers hair removal, skin rejuvenation, body contouring, and anti-aging solutions, serving dermatology clinics, plastic surgery centers, and medical spas across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific markets.
BZAI vs VERO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.8M | $13.8M |
| Net Profit | $-3.3M | $-22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | 64.0% |
| Operating Margin | -89.8% | -68.9% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | -163.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 2377500.0% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.7% | -143.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | $-12.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $23.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.3M | $-22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.0% | 64.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 64.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 69.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 66.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 66.6% |
| Q4 25 | -89.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -190.3% | -68.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -57.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -69.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -47.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -44.4% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -221.3% | -163.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -90.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -50.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -61.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -120.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -56.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.25 | $-12.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-8.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-17.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-10.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-13.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-30.93 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-16.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $45.8M | $4.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $39.0M | $2.7M |
| Total Assets | $102.2M | $61.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.1M |
| Q4 25 | $39.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-22.5M |
| Q4 25 | $102.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.9M | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $63.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $72.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $79.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $85.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-16.5M | $-4.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-16.5M | $-4.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -69.6% | -35.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-20.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-16.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.9M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-16.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.9M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | -69.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -210.2% | -35.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BZAI
Segment breakdown not available.
VERO
| Products And Services | $10.8M | 79% |
| Leases | $2.9M | 21% |
