vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BEAZER HOMES USA INC (BZH) and Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. (TPH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($972.6M vs $363.5M, roughly 2.7× BEAZER HOMES USA INC). Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.2% vs -9.0%, a 15.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-22.4% vs -22.5%). Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($213.2M vs $-170.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Tri Pointe Homes, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (1.8% CAGR vs -18.1%).
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. is a home construction company based in Atlanta, Georgia. In 2016, the company was the 11th largest home builder in the United States based on the number of homes closed. The company operates in 13 states.
Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. is a home construction company headquartered in Incline Village, Nevada. It also offers financing and insurance services to homebuyers. It operates in Arizona, California, Nevada, Washington, Colorado, Texas, the District of Columbia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia. The company is the 18th largest home construction company in the United States based on the number of homes closed.
BZH vs TPH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $363.5M | $972.6M |
| Net Profit | $-32.6M | $60.2M |
| Gross Margin | 10.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -8.8% | 8.1% |
| Net Margin | -9.0% | 6.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -22.5% | -22.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1141.4% | -53.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.13 | $0.70 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $363.5M | $972.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $791.9M | $854.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $545.4M | $902.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $565.3M | $740.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $806.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $595.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $541.5M | $939.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-32.6M | $60.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.0M | $56.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-324.0K | $60.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | $64.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $129.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.1M | $111.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.2M | $118.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.2M | $99.1M |
| Q4 25 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | 12.3% |
| Q4 25 | -9.0% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.2% | 10.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.13 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.01 | $0.64 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $0.68 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.42 | $0.70 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.10 | $1.37 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.69 | $1.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | $1.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.26 | $1.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $120.8M | $982.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $3.3B |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $5.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $120.8M | $982.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.7M | $792.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.9M | $622.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $85.1M | $812.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.4M | $970.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $203.9M | $676.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.2M | $492.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $132.9M | $944.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $646.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $3.0B |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $5.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-165.3M | $221.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-170.9M | $213.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -47.0% | 21.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.67× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-2.8M | $128.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-165.3M | $221.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.2M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-62.3M | $-74.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $-31.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-159.4M | $360.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $185.4M | $167.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-83.4M | $23.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.0M | $144.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-170.9M | $213.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $242.7M | $39.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-70.2M | $-84.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.4M | $-39.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-164.6M | $355.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $179.8M | $161.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.6M | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-19.9M | $138.3M |
| Q4 25 | -47.0% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.6% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.9% | -9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.8% | -5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -35.1% | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | 14.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.7% | 14.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.67× | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.34× | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.27× | -0.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | -50.92× | 2.79× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.56× | 1.50× | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.07× | 0.20× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.36× | 1.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BZH
| West Segment | $223.5M | 61% |
| East Segment | $93.5M | 26% |
| Southeast Segment | $46.5M | 13% |
TPH
| West | $547.8M | 56% |
| Central | $245.1M | 25% |
| East | $161.8M | 17% |
| Financial Services Segment | $18.0M | 2% |
| Land | $7.9M | 1% |
