vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caring Brands, Inc. (CABR) and HARMONIC INC. (HLIT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HARMONIC INC. runs the higher net margin — 103.4% vs -137671.4%, a 137774.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Dunkin' Brands Group, Inc. was an American restaurant holding company that ran three chains of fast-food restaurants: Dunkin' Donuts, Mister Donut, and Baskin-Robbins. It was headquartered in Canton, Massachusetts. It was acquired by Inspire Brands in 2020.
Harmonic Inc. is an American technology company that develops and markets video routing, server, and storage products for companies that produce, process, and distribute video content for television and the Internet.
CABR vs HLIT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $740 | $-53.0M |
| Net Profit | $-1.0M | $-54.8M |
| Gross Margin | 60.5% | 103.3% |
| Operating Margin | -135064.2% | — |
| Net Margin | -137671.4% | 103.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -267.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -243.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.08 | $-0.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $-53.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $740 | $142.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $138.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $133.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $31.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $195.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $138.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $122.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-54.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $38.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-12.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-8.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 103.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.5% | 54.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 53.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 59.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 53.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 51.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -135064.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -11.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -7.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 103.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -137671.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 120.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $16.1K | $124.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $131.3K | $112.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6M | $383.2M |
| Total Assets | $3.2M | $718.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.05× | 0.29× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $124.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.1K | $127.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $123.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $148.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $101.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $58.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $84.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $112.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.3K | $112.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $113.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $114.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $114.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $383.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6M | $443.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $446.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $446.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $465.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $428.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $392.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $409.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $718.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2M | $758.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $783.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $773.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $796.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $759.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $713.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $740.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.05× | 0.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-631.9K | $12.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $9.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -18.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | -5.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $96.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-631.9K | $23.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $83.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $48.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-22.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $26.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $81.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $46.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-24.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $24.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | -18.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 61.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 146.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
