vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CACI INTERNATIONAL INC (CACI) and Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Viking Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.0B vs $2.4B, roughly 1.7× CACI INTERNATIONAL INC). Viking Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — 12.9% vs 5.5%, a 7.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
CACI International Inc is a U.S.-headquartered multinational professional services and information technology firm. It delivers custom technology solutions, cybersecurity services, data analytics, and mission-critical operational support to government defense, intelligence, civilian agencies, and select private sector clients.
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH) is a holding company that is based in the United States and domiciled in Bermuda. It operates three cruise lines as wholly owned subsidiaries: Norwegian Cruise Line, Oceania Cruises, and Regent Seven Seas Cruises. With its subsidiaries combined, it is the third-largest cruise operator in the world. It is a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
CACI vs VIK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.4B | $4.0B |
| Net Profit | $130.4M | $514.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 73.4% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 15.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.5% | 12.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 16.6% | 35.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $5.88 | $1.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $718.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $130.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $123.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $124.8M | $514.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.9M | $439.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.9M | $-105.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $120.2M | $379.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $134.7M | $159.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 73.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 55.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 74.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 57.8% |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.1% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.7% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 20.5% |
| Q1 26 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.5% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 19.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | -14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | $5.88 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.59 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.63 | $1.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.11 | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.00 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.88 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.33 | $0.87 | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.97 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $158.0M | $3.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | $803.5M |
| Total Assets | $11.6B | $11.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.21× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $158.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $423.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $133.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.2M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.9M | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $175.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $440.7M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $134.0M | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $803.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $278.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $-267.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | $-688.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $-1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $11.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.7B | $11.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6B | $11.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | $10.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.21× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.44× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $508.4M | $663.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $221.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.90× | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $641.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $508.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $154.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $171.1M | $663.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $156.0M | $470.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $230.3M | $587.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.7M | $828.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.2M | $419.8M |
| Q1 26 | $221.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $138.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $128.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $134.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.90× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.24× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | 1.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.99× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | 2.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
