vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Candel Therapeutics, Inc. (CADL) and Singularity Future Technology Ltd. (SGLY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Singularity Future Technology Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($147.6K vs $102.0K, roughly 1.4× Candel Therapeutics, Inc.). Singularity Future Technology Ltd. runs the higher net margin — -451.2% vs -8622.5%, a 8171.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Candel Therapeutics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (229.0% vs -68.9%).
Candel Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company specializing in developing oncolytic immunotherapies for cancer treatment. Its product pipeline covers solid tumors and hematological malignancies, serving global oncology markets and addressing unmet medical needs for patients with limited treatment options.
Singularity Education Group is an American company that offers executive educational programs, a business incubator, and business consultancy services. Although the company uses the word "university" in its branding, it is not an accredited university and has no academic programs or accreditation.
CADL vs SGLY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2023 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $102.0K | $147.6K |
| Net Profit | $-8.8M | $-665.9K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -9444.1% | -407.0% |
| Net Margin | -8622.5% | -451.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 229.0% | -68.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -906.3% | -103.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.30 | $-0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $147.6K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.9K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $474.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $363.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $474.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $501.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $832.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $446.6K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-665.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-952.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-327.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-961.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-918.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-949.8K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 83.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -54.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -59.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -407.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -183.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 38.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -325.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -144.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -204.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -115.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -313.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -451.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3077.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -200.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -460.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -69.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -191.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -110.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -212.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.46 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.54 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $59.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $39.7M | $4.7M |
| Total Assets | $67.2M | $21.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $18.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-10.8M | $-8.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -10742.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 135.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-35.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-745.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $407.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-9.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $126.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
