vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Conagra Brands (CAG) and CSX Corporation (CSX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

CSX Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.5B vs $3.0B, roughly 1.2× Conagra Brands). CSX Corporation runs the higher net margin — 23.2% vs -22.3%, a 45.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CSX Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.7% vs -6.8%). CSX Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($793.0M vs $138.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Conagra Brands's revenue compounded faster (-0.9% CAGR vs -3.0%).

Conagra Brands, Inc. is an American consumer packaged goods holding company that makes and sells products under various brand names that are available in supermarkets, restaurants, and food service establishments. Based on its 2021 revenue, the company ranked 331st on the 2022 Fortune 500. Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, Conagra was founded in Nebraska in 1919 and was originally called Nebraska Consolidated Mills.

CSX Transportation, known colloquially as simply CSX, is a Class I freight railroad company operating in the Eastern United States and the Canadian provinces of Ontario and Quebec. Operating about 21,000 route miles (34,000 km) of track, it is the leading subsidiary of CSX Corporation, a Fortune 500 company headquartered in Jacksonville, Florida.

CAG vs CSX — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CSX
CSX
1.2× larger
CSX
$3.5B
$3.0B
CAG
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
CSX
CSX
+8.5% gap
CSX
1.7%
-6.8%
CAG
Higher net margin
CSX
CSX
45.5% more per $
CSX
23.2%
-22.3%
CAG
More free cash flow
CSX
CSX
$654.2M more FCF
CSX
$793.0M
$138.8M
CAG
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
CAG
CAG
Annualised
CAG
-0.9%
-3.0%
CSX

Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
CAG
CAG
CSX
CSX
Revenue
$3.0B
$3.5B
Net Profit
$-663.6M
$807.0M
Gross Margin
23.4%
Operating Margin
-20.1%
29.9%
Net Margin
-22.3%
23.2%
Revenue YoY
-6.8%
1.7%
Net Profit YoY
-333.3%
401.2%
EPS (diluted)
$-1.39

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CAG
CAG
CSX
CSX
Q1 26
$3.5B
Q4 25
$3.0B
$3.5B
Q3 25
$2.6B
$3.6B
Q2 25
$2.8B
$3.6B
Q1 25
$2.8B
$3.4B
Q4 24
$3.2B
$3.5B
Q3 24
$2.8B
$3.6B
Q2 24
$2.9B
$3.7B
Net Profit
CAG
CAG
CSX
CSX
Q1 26
$807.0M
Q4 25
$-663.6M
$720.0M
Q3 25
$164.5M
$694.0M
Q2 25
$256.0M
$829.0M
Q1 25
$145.1M
$646.0M
Q4 24
$284.5M
$720.0M
Q3 24
$466.8M
$894.0M
Q2 24
$-567.3M
$963.0M
Gross Margin
CAG
CAG
CSX
CSX
Q1 26
Q4 25
23.4%
Q3 25
24.3%
Q2 25
25.4%
Q1 25
25.0%
Q4 24
26.5%
Q3 24
26.5%
Q2 24
27.7%
Operating Margin
CAG
CAG
CSX
CSX
Q1 26
29.9%
Q4 25
-20.1%
31.6%
Q3 25
13.2%
30.3%
Q2 25
0.1%
35.9%
Q1 25
13.9%
30.4%
Q4 24
14.8%
30.8%
Q3 24
17.7%
37.4%
Q2 24
-16.3%
39.1%
Net Margin
CAG
CAG
CSX
CSX
Q1 26
23.2%
Q4 25
-22.3%
20.5%
Q3 25
6.2%
19.3%
Q2 25
9.2%
23.2%
Q1 25
5.1%
18.9%
Q4 24
8.9%
20.3%
Q3 24
16.7%
24.7%
Q2 24
-19.5%
26.0%
EPS (diluted)
CAG
CAG
CSX
CSX
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-1.39
$0.39
Q3 25
$0.34
$0.37
Q2 25
$0.54
$0.44
Q1 25
$0.30
$0.34
Q4 24
$0.59
$0.38
Q3 24
$0.97
$0.46
Q2 24
$-1.19
$0.49

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CAG
CAG
CSX
CSX
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$46.6M
$1.1B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.2B
$18.9B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$8.1B
$13.6B
Total Assets
$19.5B
$44.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.89×
1.39×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CAG
CAG
CSX
CSX
Q1 26
$1.1B
Q4 25
$46.6M
$5.0M
Q3 25
$698.1M
$6.0M
Q2 25
$68.0M
$6.0M
Q1 25
$49.4M
$8.0M
Q4 24
$37.4M
$72.0M
Q3 24
$128.7M
$12.0M
Q2 24
$77.7M
$4.0M
Total Debt
CAG
CAG
CSX
CSX
Q1 26
$18.9B
Q4 25
$7.2B
$18.2B
Q3 25
$8.2B
$18.6B
Q2 25
$7.3B
$18.6B
Q1 25
$7.3B
$18.5B
Q4 24
$7.3B
$17.9B
Q3 24
$7.5B
$18.5B
Q2 24
$7.5B
$18.0B
Stockholders' Equity
CAG
CAG
CSX
CSX
Q1 26
$13.6B
Q4 25
$8.1B
$13.2B
Q3 25
$8.9B
$12.8B
Q2 25
$8.9B
$12.4B
Q1 25
$8.8B
$12.2B
Q4 24
$8.8B
$12.5B
Q3 24
$8.7B
$12.9B
Q2 24
$8.4B
$12.6B
Total Assets
CAG
CAG
CSX
CSX
Q1 26
$44.2B
Q4 25
$19.5B
$43.7B
Q3 25
$21.2B
$43.3B
Q2 25
$20.9B
$42.9B
Q1 25
$20.7B
$43.2B
Q4 24
$21.0B
$42.8B
Q3 24
$21.2B
$43.1B
Q2 24
$20.9B
$42.4B
Debt / Equity
CAG
CAG
CSX
CSX
Q1 26
1.39×
Q4 25
0.89×
1.38×
Q3 25
0.92×
1.45×
Q2 25
0.81×
1.50×
Q1 25
0.83×
1.52×
Q4 24
0.83×
1.43×
Q3 24
0.86×
1.43×
Q2 24
0.89×
1.42×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CAG
CAG
CSX
CSX
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$210.6M
$1.3B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$138.8M
$793.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
4.7%
22.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.58×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$876.4M
$2.0B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CAG
CAG
CSX
CSX
Q1 26
$1.3B
Q4 25
$210.6M
$1.4B
Q3 25
$120.6M
$1.3B
Q2 25
$345.7M
$635.0M
Q1 25
$592.0M
$1.3B
Q4 24
$485.6M
$1.4B
Q3 24
$268.6M
$1.7B
Q2 24
$484.3M
$1.1B
Free Cash Flow
CAG
CAG
CSX
CSX
Q1 26
$793.0M
Q4 25
$138.8M
$709.0M
Q3 25
$-26.2M
$607.0M
Q2 25
$260.6M
$-141.0M
Q1 25
$503.2M
$536.0M
Q4 24
$403.2M
$550.0M
Q3 24
$135.6M
$1.1B
Q2 24
$405.8M
$547.0M
FCF Margin
CAG
CAG
CSX
CSX
Q1 26
22.8%
Q4 25
4.7%
20.2%
Q3 25
-1.0%
16.9%
Q2 25
9.4%
-3.9%
Q1 25
17.7%
15.7%
Q4 24
12.6%
15.5%
Q3 24
4.9%
29.3%
Q2 24
14.0%
14.8%
Capex Intensity
CAG
CAG
CSX
CSX
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.4%
19.3%
Q3 25
5.6%
20.4%
Q2 25
3.1%
21.7%
Q1 25
3.1%
21.0%
Q4 24
2.6%
23.7%
Q3 24
4.8%
17.3%
Q2 24
2.7%
14.6%
Cash Conversion
CAG
CAG
CSX
CSX
Q1 26
1.58×
Q4 25
1.93×
Q3 25
0.73×
1.93×
Q2 25
1.35×
0.77×
Q1 25
4.08×
1.94×
Q4 24
1.71×
1.93×
Q3 24
0.58×
1.89×
Q2 24
1.13×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CAG
CAG

Frozen$1.1B35%
Other Shelf Stable$625.2M21%
Snacks$583.9M20%
Foodservice$288.4M10%
Other$230.4M8%
Refrigerated$196.0M7%

CSX
CSX

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons