vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Conagra Brands (CAG) and Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $3.0B, roughly 1.3× Conagra Brands). Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.5% vs -22.3%, a 22.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.0% vs -6.8%). Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.0B vs $138.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.4% CAGR vs -0.9%).
Conagra Brands, Inc. is an American consumer packaged goods holding company that makes and sells products under various brand names that are available in supermarkets, restaurants, and food service establishments. Based on its 2021 revenue, the company ranked 331st on the 2022 Fortune 500. Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, Conagra was founded in Nebraska in 1919 and was originally called Nebraska Consolidated Mills.
Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is an American multinational information technology infrastructure services provider, headquartered in New York City and created from the spin-off of IBM's infrastructure services business in 2021. The company designs, builds, manages and develops large-scale information systems. The company also has business advisory services. It is currently the world's largest IT infrastructure services provider, and the fifth-largest consulting provider.
CAG vs KD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.0B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $-663.6M | $17.0M |
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -20.1% | 3.5% |
| Net Margin | -22.3% | 0.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -6.8% | 0.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -333.3% | -75.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.39 | $0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $3.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $17.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-663.6M | $57.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.5M | $68.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $256.0M | $56.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $145.1M | $69.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $284.5M | $215.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $466.8M | $-43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-567.3M | $11.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | 21.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.0% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.7% | 21.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -20.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.7% | -0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.3% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -22.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.7% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -19.5% | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.39 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.54 | $0.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.59 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.19 | $0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $46.6M | $2.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.1B | — |
| Total Assets | $19.5B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.89× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $46.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $698.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.7M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5B | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.4B | $996.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.5B | $11.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.2B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9B | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.7B | $10.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.0B | $9.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.2B | $10.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.9B | $10.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.89× | 1.92× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.92× | 2.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.81× | 2.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.83× | 2.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.83× | 2.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.86× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.89× | 3.12× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $210.6M | $948.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $138.8M | $2.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.7% | 53.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | 16.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 55.76× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $876.4M | $2.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $948.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $210.6M | $428.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.6M | $146.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $345.7M | $-124.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $592.0M | $581.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $485.6M | $260.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $268.6M | $149.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.3M | $-48.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $138.8M | $208.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.2M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $260.6M | $-267.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $503.2M | $341.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $403.2M | $151.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.6M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $405.8M | $-170.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 53.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.4% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.7% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.0% | -4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 55.76× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.35× | -2.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.08× | 8.42× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.71× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.36× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAG
| Frozen | $1.1B | 35% |
| Other Shelf Stable | $625.2M | 21% |
| Snacks | $583.9M | 20% |
| Foodservice | $288.4M | 10% |
| Other | $230.4M | 8% |
| Refrigerated | $196.0M | 7% |
KD
| Principal Markets | $1.3B | 34% |
| United States | $1.0B | 27% |
| Strategic Markets | $916.0M | 24% |
| Japan | $556.0M | 15% |
