vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Conagra Brands (CAG) and TELUS CORP (TU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TELUS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.7B vs $3.0B, roughly 1.2× Conagra Brands). TELUS CORP runs the higher net margin — -4.8% vs -22.3%, a 17.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TELUS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.2% vs -6.8%).
Conagra Brands, Inc. is an American consumer packaged goods holding company that makes and sells products under various brand names that are available in supermarkets, restaurants, and food service establishments. Based on its 2021 revenue, the company ranked 331st on the 2022 Fortune 500. Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, Conagra was founded in Nebraska in 1919 and was originally called Nebraska Consolidated Mills.
TELUS CORPTUEarnings & Financial Report
Telus Corporation is a Canadian publicly traded holding company and conglomerate, headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, which is the parent company of several subsidiaries: Telus Communications offers telephony, television, data and Internet services; Telus Mobility offers wireless services; Telus Health operates companies that provide health products and services; and Telus Digital operates worldwide, providing multilingual customer service outsourcing and digital IT services. Telus ...
CAG vs TU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.0B | $3.7B |
| Net Profit | $-663.6M | $-178.8M |
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | 90.2% |
| Operating Margin | -20.1% | 3.4% |
| Net Margin | -22.3% | -4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -6.8% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -333.3% | -210.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.39 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $-663.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $256.0M | $-178.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $145.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $284.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $466.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-567.3M | $161.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $308.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | 90.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.7% | 87.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -20.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.3% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -22.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | -4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -19.5% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.39 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.54 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.59 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.19 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.64 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $46.6M | $2.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.1B | $11.8B |
| Total Assets | $19.5B | $44.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.89× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $46.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $698.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.7M | $676.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.9B | $11.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.4B | $12.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $19.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9B | $44.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.9B | $41.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.89× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.92× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.89× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.93× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $210.6M | $851.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $138.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $876.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $210.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $345.7M | $851.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $592.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $485.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $268.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $676.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $138.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $260.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $503.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $403.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $405.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $581.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.08× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.28× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.19× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAG
| Frozen | $1.1B | 35% |
| Other Shelf Stable | $625.2M | 21% |
| Snacks | $583.9M | 20% |
| Foodservice | $288.4M | 10% |
| Other | $230.4M | 8% |
| Refrigerated | $196.0M | 7% |
TU
Segment breakdown not available.
