vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Canaan Inc. (CAN) and EVOLUTION PETROLEUM CORP (EPM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Canaan Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($20.8M vs $20.7M, roughly 1.0× EVOLUTION PETROLEUM CORP). EVOLUTION PETROLEUM CORP runs the higher net margin — 5.2% vs -18.4%, a 23.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Canaan Inc., doing business as Canaan Creative and known simply as Canaan, is a Singapore-based computer hardware manufacturer. Established in 2013 by N.G. Zhang, Canaan specializes in Blockchain servers and ASIC microprocessors for use in bitcoin mining.
CAN vs EPM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.8M | $20.7M |
| Net Profit | $-3.8M | $1.1M |
| Gross Margin | 99.9% | 44.3% |
| Operating Margin | -15.9% | 3.2% |
| Net Margin | -18.4% | 5.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 2.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 158.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.05 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $20.8M | $20.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $21.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2M | $21.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8M | $21.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $23.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $824.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.9M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.4M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $289.0K |
| Q4 25 | 99.9% | 44.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 99.9% | 38.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 99.9% | 46.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 99.9% | 46.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 99.8% | 46.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.2% |
| Q4 25 | -15.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.0% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -45.5% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -77.2% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -193.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.1% |
| Q4 25 | -18.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -104.4% | 16.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -102.7% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -112.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.05 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.25 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $3.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $52.4M | $67.5M |
| Total Assets | $92.5M | $169.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.12× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $714.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $52.4M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.7M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.8M | $71.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $71.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $76.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.6M | $79.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.8M | $81.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $83.5M |
| Q4 25 | $92.5M | $169.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.7M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.0M | $160.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $156.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $160.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.3M | $157.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.7M | $162.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $166.5M |
| Q4 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 5.09× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.47× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.64× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAN
Segment breakdown not available.
EPM
| Crude Oil | $10.7M | 52% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $7.4M | 36% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $2.5M | 12% |