vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Canaan Inc. (CAN) and Nano Labs Ltd (NA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Canaan Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($20.8M vs $2.7M, roughly 7.7× Nano Labs Ltd). Nano Labs Ltd runs the higher net margin — 754.5% vs -18.4%, a 772.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Canaan Inc., doing business as Canaan Creative and known simply as Canaan, is a Singapore-based computer hardware manufacturer. Established in 2013 by N.G. Zhang, Canaan specializes in Blockchain servers and ASIC microprocessors for use in bitcoin mining.
Weebit Nano is a public semiconductor IP company founded in Israel in 2015 and headquartered in Hod HaSharon, Israel. The company develops Resistive Random-Access Memory technologies. Resistive Random-Access Memory is a specialized form of non-volatile memory (NVM) for the semiconductor industry. The company's products are targeted at a broad range of NVM markets where persistence, performance, and endurance are all required. ReRAM technology can be integrated in electronic devices like weara...
CAN vs NA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.8M | $2.7M |
| Net Profit | $-3.8M | $20.3M |
| Gross Margin | 99.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.9% | — |
| Net Margin | -18.4% | 754.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.05 | $1.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $20.8M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | $20.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.9M | $-985.5K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $-8.0M |
| Q4 25 | 99.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 99.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 99.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 99.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 99.8% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | -15.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -45.5% | -459.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -77.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -193.9% | -237.2% |
| Q4 25 | -18.4% | 754.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -104.4% | -85.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -102.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -112.3% | -231.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.05 | $1.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.25 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $4.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.2M | $24.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $52.4M | $106.5M |
| Total Assets | $92.5M | $159.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.12× | 0.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $50.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | $6.2M | $24.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2M | $24.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $22.5M |
| Q4 25 | $52.4M | $106.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.8M | $86.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.8M | $-5.1M |
| Q4 25 | $92.5M | $159.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.0M | $206.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.7M | $51.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.12× | 0.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-8.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-8.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -312.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-10.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-8.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-15.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | -312.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -620.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -443.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 133.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.41× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
