vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Canaan Inc. (CAN) and NaaS Technology Inc. (NAAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NaaS Technology Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.9M vs $20.8M, roughly 1.2× Canaan Inc.). Canaan Inc. runs the higher net margin — -18.4% vs -193.3%, a 174.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Canaan Inc., doing business as Canaan Creative and known simply as Canaan, is a Singapore-based computer hardware manufacturer. Established in 2013 by N.G. Zhang, Canaan specializes in Blockchain servers and ASIC microprocessors for use in bitcoin mining.
NaaS Technology Inc. is a leading electric vehicle energy service provider based in China. It delivers one-stop solutions covering charging network operation, software and hardware support for charging station operators, and value-added services such as charging location search and payment for EV owners, serving both enterprise and individual customers across domestic and select overseas markets.
CAN vs NAAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.8M | $25.9M |
| Net Profit | $-3.8M | $-50.0M |
| Gross Margin | 99.9% | 29.2% |
| Operating Margin | -15.9% | -144.2% |
| Net Margin | -18.4% | -193.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 121.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 18.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.05 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $20.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8M | $25.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $-50.0M |
| Q4 25 | 99.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 99.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 99.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 99.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 99.8% | 29.2% |
| Q4 25 | -15.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -45.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -77.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -193.9% | -144.2% |
| Q4 25 | -18.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -104.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -102.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -112.3% | -193.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $24.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $52.4M | $-33.4M |
| Total Assets | $92.5M | $180.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.12× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.7M |
| Q4 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $52.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.8M | $-33.4M |
| Q4 25 | $92.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.7M | $180.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-25.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-25.7M |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
