vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) and Crane NXT, Co. (CXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

CrossAmerica Partners LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($866.3M vs $476.9M, roughly 1.8× Crane NXT, Co.). Crane NXT, Co. runs the higher net margin — 10.0% vs 1.2%, a 8.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Crane NXT, Co. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.5% vs -8.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Crane NXT, Co.'s revenue compounded faster (23.3% CAGR vs -4.1%).

TowerBrook Capital Partners, L.P. is an investment management firm headquartered in London and New York City. TowerBrook spun out of Soros Fund Management in 2005 and became known for acquiring majority stakes in companies such as Jimmy Choo. Managing $25+ billion in a number of private equity funds and structured opportunities funds, TowerBrook listed 110 investments on its website as of 2025.

Crane Co. is an American industrial products company based in Stamford, Connecticut. Founded by Richard Teller Crane in 1855, it became one of the leading manufacturers of bathroom fixtures in the United States, until 1990, when that division was sold off. In 1960 it began the process of becoming a holding company with a diverse portfolio. Its business segments are Aerospace & Electronics, Engineered Materials, Fluid Handling, and Controls. Industries served by these segments include chemical...

CAPL vs CXT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CAPL
CAPL
1.8× larger
CAPL
$866.3M
$476.9M
CXT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
CXT
CXT
+27.7% gap
CXT
19.5%
-8.3%
CAPL
Higher net margin
CXT
CXT
8.8% more per $
CXT
10.0%
1.2%
CAPL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
CXT
CXT
Annualised
CXT
23.3%
-4.1%
CAPL

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CAPL
CAPL
CXT
CXT
Revenue
$866.3M
$476.9M
Net Profit
$10.2M
$47.5M
Gross Margin
12.4%
42.4%
Operating Margin
3.0%
16.7%
Net Margin
1.2%
10.0%
Revenue YoY
-8.3%
19.5%
Net Profit YoY
-39.6%
EPS (diluted)
$0.24
$0.82

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CAPL
CAPL
CXT
CXT
Q4 25
$866.3M
$476.9M
Q3 25
$971.8M
$445.1M
Q2 25
$961.9M
$404.4M
Q1 25
$862.5M
$330.3M
Q4 24
$944.2M
$399.1M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$403.5M
Q2 24
$1.1B
$370.6M
Q1 24
$941.5M
$313.6M
Net Profit
CAPL
CAPL
CXT
CXT
Q4 25
$10.2M
$47.5M
Q3 25
$13.6M
$50.5M
Q2 25
$25.2M
$24.9M
Q1 25
$-7.1M
$21.7M
Q4 24
$16.9M
Q3 24
$10.7M
$47.1M
Q2 24
$12.4M
$41.6M
Q1 24
$-17.5M
$37.8M
Gross Margin
CAPL
CAPL
CXT
CXT
Q4 25
12.4%
42.4%
Q3 25
10.8%
43.3%
Q2 25
10.5%
41.7%
Q1 25
10.4%
42.4%
Q4 24
10.7%
45.2%
Q3 24
10.3%
42.5%
Q2 24
9.2%
43.4%
Q1 24
8.6%
48.6%
Operating Margin
CAPL
CAPL
CXT
CXT
Q4 25
3.0%
16.7%
Q3 25
2.9%
18.4%
Q2 25
4.3%
11.8%
Q1 25
0.2%
11.3%
Q4 24
3.0%
17.7%
Q3 24
2.5%
18.6%
Q2 24
2.5%
18.2%
Q1 24
-1.4%
17.7%
Net Margin
CAPL
CAPL
CXT
CXT
Q4 25
1.2%
10.0%
Q3 25
1.4%
11.3%
Q2 25
2.6%
6.2%
Q1 25
-0.8%
6.6%
Q4 24
1.8%
Q3 24
1.0%
11.7%
Q2 24
1.1%
11.2%
Q1 24
-1.9%
12.1%
EPS (diluted)
CAPL
CAPL
CXT
CXT
Q4 25
$0.24
$0.82
Q3 25
$0.34
$0.87
Q2 25
$0.64
$0.43
Q1 25
$-0.20
$0.38
Q4 24
$0.42
$1.00
Q3 24
$0.27
$0.81
Q2 24
$0.31
$0.72
Q1 24
$-0.48
$0.66

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CAPL
CAPL
CXT
CXT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$3.1M
$233.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$687.2M
$1.0B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.3B
Total Assets
$964.7M
$3.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.80×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CAPL
CAPL
CXT
CXT
Q4 25
$3.1M
$233.8M
Q3 25
$5.8M
$182.4M
Q2 25
$9.7M
$152.5M
Q1 25
$6.7M
$173.8M
Q4 24
$3.4M
$165.8M
Q3 24
$7.8M
$165.1M
Q2 24
$5.5M
$175.5M
Q1 24
$6.3M
$220.6M
Total Debt
CAPL
CAPL
CXT
CXT
Q4 25
$687.2M
$1.0B
Q3 25
$700.8M
$834.3M
Q2 25
$722.7M
$861.8M
Q1 25
$774.1M
$541.1M
Q4 24
$763.9M
$540.6M
Q3 24
$769.2M
$638.2M
Q2 24
$786.7M
$638.9M
Q1 24
$795.8M
$639.6M
Stockholders' Equity
CAPL
CAPL
CXT
CXT
Q4 25
$1.3B
Q3 25
$1.2B
Q2 25
$1.2B
Q1 25
$1.1B
Q4 24
$1.1B
Q3 24
$1.1B
Q2 24
$989.8M
Q1 24
$964.1M
Total Assets
CAPL
CAPL
CXT
CXT
Q4 25
$964.7M
$3.1B
Q3 25
$998.9M
$2.9B
Q2 25
$1.0B
$2.9B
Q1 25
$1.1B
$2.4B
Q4 24
$1.1B
$2.4B
Q3 24
$1.1B
$2.4B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$2.4B
Q1 24
$1.2B
$2.1B
Debt / Equity
CAPL
CAPL
CXT
CXT
Q4 25
0.80×
Q3 25
0.69×
Q2 25
0.73×
Q1 25
0.49×
Q4 24
0.51×
Q3 24
0.60×
Q2 24
0.65×
Q1 24
0.66×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CAPL
CAPL
CXT
CXT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$29.4M
$105.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$22.4M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
2.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.89×
2.23×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$55.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CAPL
CAPL
CXT
CXT
Q4 25
$29.4M
$105.8M
Q3 25
$24.4M
$92.0M
Q2 25
$22.6M
$62.8M
Q1 25
$15.0M
$-19.1M
Q4 24
$11.1M
$81.1M
Q3 24
$41.9M
$66.7M
Q2 24
$28.9M
$56.8M
Q1 24
$5.8M
$9.5M
Free Cash Flow
CAPL
CAPL
CXT
CXT
Q4 25
$22.4M
Q3 25
$17.7M
$78.7M
Q2 25
$10.8M
$55.8M
Q1 25
$4.9M
$-32.2M
Q4 24
$3.9M
Q3 24
$34.2M
$53.5M
Q2 24
$23.6M
$47.9M
Q1 24
$-289.0K
$-3.0M
FCF Margin
CAPL
CAPL
CXT
CXT
Q4 25
2.6%
Q3 25
1.8%
17.7%
Q2 25
1.1%
13.8%
Q1 25
0.6%
-9.7%
Q4 24
0.4%
Q3 24
3.2%
13.3%
Q2 24
2.1%
12.9%
Q1 24
-0.0%
-1.0%
Capex Intensity
CAPL
CAPL
CXT
CXT
Q4 25
0.8%
Q3 25
0.7%
3.0%
Q2 25
1.2%
1.7%
Q1 25
1.2%
4.0%
Q4 24
0.8%
Q3 24
0.7%
3.3%
Q2 24
0.5%
2.4%
Q1 24
0.6%
4.0%
Cash Conversion
CAPL
CAPL
CXT
CXT
Q4 25
2.89×
2.23×
Q3 25
1.79×
1.82×
Q2 25
0.90×
2.52×
Q1 25
-0.88×
Q4 24
0.66×
Q3 24
3.92×
1.42×
Q2 24
2.33×
1.37×
Q1 24
0.25×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CAPL
CAPL

Retail Segment$505.3M58%
Wholesale$360.9M42%
Other$1.2M0%

CXT
CXT

Other$260.9M55%
Products$181.1M38%
Services$34.9M7%

Related Comparisons