vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CAPRICOR THERAPEUTICS, INC. (CAPR) and DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. (DUOT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CAPRICOR THERAPEUTICS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.1M vs $9.5M, roughly 1.2× DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.). DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — -33.8% vs -63.9%, a 30.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (547.5% vs -7.9%). CAPRICOR THERAPEUTICS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-15.3M vs $-18.6M). Over the past eight quarters, DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (149.0% CAGR vs 93.0%).
Capricor Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on discovering, developing and commercializing innovative biological therapies including cell and gene therapies for rare diseases, cardiovascular disorders and muscular conditions. It primarily operates in the U.S. market, addressing unmet medical needs for patient groups with limited treatment options.
DUOS Technologies Group Inc. develops and deploys AI-powered automation, inspection, and security solutions for railway transportation, critical infrastructure, and commercial clients across North America. Its offerings include real-time monitoring systems and safety tools that help customers boost efficiency, reduce risks, and strengthen site security.
CAPR vs DUOT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.1M | $9.5M |
| Net Profit | $-7.1M | $-3.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.7% |
| Operating Margin | -69.1% | -36.1% |
| Net Margin | -63.9% | -33.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.9% | 547.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -833.8% | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1M | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.1M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.6M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-11.0M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -14.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -36.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -60.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -36.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -69.1% | -211.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -575.2% | -59.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -291.9% | -212.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -209.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -33.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -15.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -61.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -42.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -63.9% | -233.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -555.2% | -43.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -277.0% | -212.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -199.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.18 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.11 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.38 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.35 | $-0.43 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.31 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $151.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $145.5M | $48.6M |
| Total Assets | $170.5M | $63.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.0M | $613.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $48.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.5M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.3M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $63.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $69.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $31.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $34.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $170.5M | $35.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.0M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.3M | $21.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.4M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-14.8M | $-2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-15.3M | $-18.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -137.3% | -196.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 167.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-41.2M | $-37.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-14.8M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.6M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.3M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-18.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.7M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.3M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -196.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -139.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -69.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -105.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -137.3% | 166.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -515.2% | -90.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -310.9% | -184.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -38.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 167.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 93.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 58.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAPR
Segment breakdown not available.
DUOT
| Services And Consulting Related Parties | $8.5M | 90% |
| Other | $929.3K | 10% |
