vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Maplebear Inc. (CART) and CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Maplebear Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($992.0M vs $633.7M, roughly 1.6× CENTURY ALUMINUM CO). Maplebear Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8.2% vs 0.3%, a 7.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Maplebear Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.3% vs 0.4%). Maplebear Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($171.0M vs $67.7M). Over the past eight quarters, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 10.0%).
Maplebear Inc., doing business as Instacart, is an American retail media and delivery company based in San Francisco that operates a grocery delivery and pick-up service in the United States and Canada accessible via a website and mobile app. It allows customers to order groceries, and alcohol where legal, from participating retailers with the shopping being done by a personal shopper, who picks, packs, and delivers the order.
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
CART vs CENX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $992.0M | $633.7M |
| Net Profit | $81.0M | $1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 72.3% | 13.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.9% | 5.2% |
| Net Margin | 8.2% | 0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.3% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -45.3% | -96.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $992.0M | $633.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $939.0M | $632.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $914.0M | $628.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $897.0M | $633.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $883.0M | $630.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $852.0M | $539.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $823.0M | $560.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $820.0M | $489.5M |
| Q4 25 | $81.0M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.0M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.0M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $106.0M | $29.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $148.0M | $45.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $118.0M | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.0M | $246.8M |
| Q4 25 | 72.3% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 73.7% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.2% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.2% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 75.2% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 75.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 74.9% | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.7% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.2% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.6% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | -0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.8% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.8% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.9% | 50.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.31 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.51 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.41 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.37 | $0.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.53 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.42 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.20 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.43 | $2.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $687.0M | $134.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.5B | $805.6M |
| Total Assets | $3.7B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $687.0M | $134.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $40.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $44.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $32.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $41.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $93.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $805.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $741.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $724.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $726.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $694.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $628.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $601.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1B | $601.5M |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.1B | $1.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $183.0M | $102.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $171.0M | $67.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.2% | 10.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.26× | 57.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $910.0M | $84.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $183.0M | $102.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $287.0M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $203.0M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $298.0M | $72.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $153.0M | $-41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $185.0M | $20.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $244.0M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $105.0M | $-14.8M |
| Q4 25 | $171.0M | $67.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $272.0M | $-18.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $187.0M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $280.0M | $51.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $141.0M | $-54.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $171.0M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $220.0M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $91.0M | $-44.5M |
| Q4 25 | 17.2% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.0% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.5% | -2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.2% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.0% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.1% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.7% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | -9.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.26× | 57.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.99× | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.81× | 2.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.03× | -0.92× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.57× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.81× | -0.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CART
| Transaction | $698.0M | 70% |
| Advertising And Other | $294.0M | 30% |
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
