vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Maplebear Inc. (CART) and PLEXUS CORP (PLXS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PLEXUS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $992.0M, roughly 1.2× Maplebear Inc.). Maplebear Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8.2% vs 4.3%, a 3.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PLEXUS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.7% vs 12.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Maplebear Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (10.0% CAGR vs 7.2%).
Maplebear Inc., doing business as Instacart, is an American retail media and delivery company based in San Francisco that operates a grocery delivery and pick-up service in the United States and Canada accessible via a website and mobile app. It allows customers to order groceries, and alcohol where legal, from participating retailers with the shopping being done by a personal shopper, who picks, packs, and delivers the order.
Plex Systems, Inc. is an American software company based in Troy, Michigan. The company develops and markets the Plex Manufacturing Cloud, a software as a service (SaaS) or cloud computing ERP for manufacturing.
CART vs PLXS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $992.0M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $81.0M | $49.8M |
| Gross Margin | 72.3% | 10.2% |
| Operating Margin | 9.9% | 5.3% |
| Net Margin | 8.2% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.3% | 18.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -45.3% | 27.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $1.82 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $992.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $939.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $914.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $897.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $883.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $852.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $823.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $41.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $81.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $106.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $148.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $118.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 72.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 73.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 75.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 75.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.51 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.51 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.41 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.37 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.53 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.20 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $687.0M | $303.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.5B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $3.7B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $248.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $687.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $183.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $171.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.26× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $910.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $183.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $287.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $203.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $298.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $153.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $185.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $244.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $171.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $272.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $187.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $280.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $141.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $171.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $220.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.26× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.99× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.00× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CART
| Transaction | $698.0M | 70% |
| Advertising And Other | $294.0M | 30% |
PLXS
| Asia-Pacific | $652.0M | 56% |
| Americas | $397.0M | 34% |
| Europe, Middle East and Africa | $116.0M | 10% |
