vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) and Nvidia (NVDA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Caterpillar Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($85.0B vs $68.1B, roughly 1.2× Nvidia). On growth, Nvidia posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (73.2% vs -17.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Caterpillar Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (125.7% CAGR vs 61.7%).
Caterpillar Inc. is an American construction, mining, and other engineering equipment manufacturer. The company is the world's largest manufacturer of construction equipment. In 2018, Caterpillar was ranked number 73 on the Fortune 500 list and number 265 on the Global Fortune 500 list. Caterpillar stock is a component of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
Nvidia Corporation is an American technology company headquartered in Santa Clara, California. Founded in 1993 by Jensen Huang, Chris Malachowsky, and Curtis Priem, it develops graphics processing units (GPUs), systems on chips (SoCs), and application programming interfaces (APIs) for data science, high-performance computing, video games, and mobile and automotive applications. Nvidia has been described as a Big Tech company.
CAT vs NVDA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $85.0B | $68.1B |
| Net Profit | — | $43.0B |
| Gross Margin | 89.5% | 75.0% |
| Operating Margin | 3.0% | 65.0% |
| Net Margin | — | 63.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -17.7% | 73.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 94.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.20 | $1.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $85.0B | $68.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.1B | $57.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.6B | $46.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.6B | $44.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.2B | $39.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.2B | $35.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.1B | $30.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7B | $26.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $43.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $31.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $26.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $18.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $22.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $19.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $16.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $14.9B |
| Q1 26 | 89.5% | 75.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.5% | 73.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.8% | 72.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.8% | 60.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.1% | 73.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.3% | 74.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.5% | 75.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.2% | 78.4% |
| Q1 26 | 3.0% | 65.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 63.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.3% | 60.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.3% | 49.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.1% | 61.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.0% | 62.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.5% | 62.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.9% | 64.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 63.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.5% | 56.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.0% | 56.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | 42.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | 56.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.2% | 55.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | 55.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 57.1% |
| Q1 26 | $4.20 | $1.76 | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.11 | $1.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.88 | $1.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.62 | $0.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.20 | $-4.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.76 | $0.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.06 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.48 | $5.98 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.0M | $10.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $0 | $8.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $21.3M | $157.3B |
| Total Assets | $98.6M | $206.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | 0.05× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $10.0M | $10.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.0B | $60.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $56.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $53.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $43.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9B | $38.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6B | $34.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $31.4B |
| Q1 26 | $0 | $8.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.7B |
| Q1 26 | $21.3M | $157.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.3B | $118.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.7B | $100.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.7B | $83.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.1B | $79.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.5B | $65.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.4B | $58.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.1B | $49.1B |
| Q1 26 | $98.6M | $206.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $98.6B | $161.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.7B | $140.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $90.3B | $125.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $85.0B | $111.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $87.8B | $96.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $86.3B | $85.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.3B | $77.1B |
| Q1 26 | 0.00× | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.20× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $36.2B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $34.9B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 51.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 835.3% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.84× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $96.7B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $36.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | $23.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $15.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $27.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $16.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $17.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $14.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $15.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $22.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $13.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $26.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $579.0M | $15.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $16.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $13.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $15.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | 51.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | 38.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.5% | 28.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 59.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 39.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 47.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | 45.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 57.5% |
| Q1 26 | 835.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.50× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | 0.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.43× | 1.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.64× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.22× | 0.91× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.45× | 0.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | 1.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAT
Segment breakdown not available.
NVDA
| Compute | $51.3B | 75% |
| Networking | $11.0B | 16% |
| Gaming | $3.7B | 5% |
| Professional Visualization | $1.3B | 2% |
| Automotive | $604.0M | 1% |
| OEM And Other | $161.0M | 0% |
| Inventory Purchase Obligations In Excess Of Projections | $31.0M | 0% |
