vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CATO CORP (CATO) and HOPE BANCORP INC (HOPE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CATO CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($155.4M vs $141.0M, roughly 1.1× HOPE BANCORP INC). HOPE BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 20.9% vs -3.3%, a 24.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HOPE BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.0% vs 6.3%). Over the past eight quarters, HOPE BANCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs -5.7%).
The Cato Corporation is an American retailer of women's fashions and accessories. The company is headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina. As of January 2016, the company operated 1,372 stores under the names Cato, Cato Plus, It's Fashion, It's Fashion Metro and Versona.
Bank of Hope is an American bank, based in Los Angeles, that focuses on the Korean American community. The bank was first established on December 30, 1980, under the name Wilshire Bank.
CATO vs HOPE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $155.4M | $141.0M |
| Net Profit | $-5.2M | $29.5M |
| Gross Margin | 32.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -5.3% | — |
| Net Margin | -3.3% | 20.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | 21.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 65.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.28 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $141.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $155.4M | $145.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.5M | $141.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $170.2M | $94.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.9M | $116.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.2M | $118.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $168.6M | $116.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $177.1M | $116.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $29.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-5.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8M | $30.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $-24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.1M | $21.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $95.0K | $24.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $25.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | 26.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.2% | 23.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.6% | 25.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | 29.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | -26.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 21.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.28 | $0.27 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.35 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.73 | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.79 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.54 | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $79.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $167.6M | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $450.2M | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $79.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $105.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $167.6M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $172.2M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $164.9M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $162.3M | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $177.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.1M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $196.9M | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $450.2M | $18.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $436.9M | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $440.8M | $18.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $452.4M | $17.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $424.4M | $17.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $455.6M | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $477.1M | $17.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-12.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -8.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-7.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | $164.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.8M | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $9.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.5M | $26.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.1M | $116.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1M | $63.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7M | $-25.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.9M | $151.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.4M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.8M | $24.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-23.8M | $106.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $60.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $-28.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -8.3% | 103.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 33.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.0% | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -16.3% | 90.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 51.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | -24.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 1.68× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.95× | 2.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.52× | -1.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CATO
| Retail Segment | $154.7M | 100% |
| Credit Card | $5.3M | 3% |
HOPE
Segment breakdown not available.
