vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Chubb Limited (CB) and PepsiCo (PEP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

PepsiCo is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($29.3B vs $15.1B, roughly 1.9× Chubb Limited). Chubb Limited runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs 8.7%, a 12.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Chubb Limited posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.3% vs 5.6%). Over the past eight quarters, PepsiCo's revenue compounded faster (26.8% CAGR vs 8.1%).

Chubb Limited is an American–Swiss company incorporated in Zürich, and listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) where it is a component of the S&P 500. Chubb is a global provider of insurance products covering property and casualty, accident and health, reinsurance, and life insurance and is the largest publicly traded property and casualty insurance company in the world. Chubb operates in 55 countries and territories and in the Lloyd's insurance market in London. Clients of Chubb consist...

PepsiCo, Inc. is an American multinational food and beverage corporation headquartered in Harrison, New York, in the hamlet of Purchase. PepsiCo's business encompasses all aspects of the food and beverage market. It oversees the manufacturing, distribution, and marketing of its products. PepsiCo was formed in 1965 with the merger of the Pepsi-Cola Company and Frito-Lay, Inc., PepsiCo has since expanded from its namesake product Pepsi to an immensely diversified range of food and beverage brands.

CB vs PEP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PEP
PEP
1.9× larger
PEP
$29.3B
$15.1B
CB
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
CB
CB
+0.7% gap
CB
6.3%
5.6%
PEP
Higher net margin
CB
CB
12.7% more per $
CB
21.3%
8.7%
PEP
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PEP
PEP
Annualised
PEP
26.8%
8.1%
CB

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CB
CB
PEP
PEP
Revenue
$15.1B
$29.3B
Net Profit
$3.2B
$2.5B
Gross Margin
53.2%
Operating Margin
25.0%
12.1%
Net Margin
21.3%
8.7%
Revenue YoY
6.3%
5.6%
Net Profit YoY
24.7%
66.8%
EPS (diluted)
$8.05
$1.85

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CB
CB
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
$15.1B
$29.3B
Q3 25
$16.1B
$23.9B
Q2 25
$14.8B
$22.7B
Q1 25
$13.4B
$17.9B
Q4 24
$14.2B
$27.8B
Q3 24
$14.8B
$23.3B
Q2 24
$13.8B
$22.5B
Q1 24
$12.9B
$18.3B
Net Profit
CB
CB
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
$3.2B
$2.5B
Q3 25
$2.8B
$2.6B
Q2 25
$3.0B
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$1.8B
Q4 24
$2.6B
$1.5B
Q3 24
$2.3B
$2.9B
Q2 24
$2.2B
$3.1B
Q1 24
$2.1B
$2.0B
Gross Margin
CB
CB
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
53.2%
Q3 25
53.6%
Q2 25
54.7%
Q1 25
55.8%
Q4 24
52.6%
Q3 24
55.4%
Q2 24
55.9%
Q1 24
54.8%
Operating Margin
CB
CB
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
25.0%
12.1%
Q3 25
24.1%
14.9%
Q2 25
25.0%
7.9%
Q1 25
12.5%
14.4%
Q4 24
22.0%
8.1%
Q3 24
20.2%
16.6%
Q2 24
19.6%
18.0%
Q1 24
20.4%
14.9%
Net Margin
CB
CB
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
21.3%
8.7%
Q3 25
17.3%
10.9%
Q2 25
20.0%
5.6%
Q1 25
10.0%
10.2%
Q4 24
18.2%
5.5%
Q3 24
15.7%
12.6%
Q2 24
16.1%
13.7%
Q1 24
16.6%
11.2%
EPS (diluted)
CB
CB
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
$8.05
$1.85
Q3 25
$6.99
$1.90
Q2 25
$7.35
$0.92
Q1 25
$3.29
$1.33
Q4 24
$6.31
$1.11
Q3 24
$5.70
$2.13
Q2 24
$5.46
$2.23
Q1 24
$5.23
$1.48

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CB
CB
PEP
PEP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$9.5B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$15.7B
$42.3B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$73.8B
$20.4B
Total Assets
$272.3B
$107.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.21×
2.07×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CB
CB
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
$9.5B
Q3 25
$8.7B
Q2 25
$8.0B
Q1 25
$8.6B
Q4 24
$9.3B
Q3 24
$8.1B
Q2 24
$6.7B
Q1 24
$8.3B
Total Debt
CB
CB
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
$15.7B
$42.3B
Q3 25
$15.7B
$44.1B
Q2 25
$13.5B
$39.3B
Q1 25
$14.5B
$39.4B
Q4 24
$14.4B
$37.2B
Q3 24
$14.6B
$38.5B
Q2 24
$13.2B
$36.6B
Q1 24
$13.2B
$37.7B
Stockholders' Equity
CB
CB
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
$73.8B
$20.4B
Q3 25
$71.9B
$19.4B
Q2 25
$69.4B
$18.4B
Q1 25
$65.7B
$18.4B
Q4 24
$64.0B
$18.0B
Q3 24
$65.8B
$19.5B
Q2 24
$61.0B
$19.4B
Q1 24
$60.5B
$19.0B
Total Assets
CB
CB
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
$272.3B
$107.4B
Q3 25
$270.2B
$106.6B
Q2 25
$261.6B
$105.3B
Q1 25
$251.8B
$101.7B
Q4 24
$246.5B
$99.5B
Q3 24
$250.6B
$100.5B
Q2 24
$238.6B
$99.5B
Q1 24
$234.9B
$100.0B
Debt / Equity
CB
CB
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
0.21×
2.07×
Q3 25
0.22×
2.28×
Q2 25
0.19×
2.14×
Q1 25
0.22×
2.14×
Q4 24
0.22×
2.06×
Q3 24
0.22×
1.98×
Q2 24
0.22×
1.88×
Q1 24
0.22×
1.98×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CB
CB
PEP
PEP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$4.1B
$6.6B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$4.7B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
16.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
6.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.26×
2.61×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$7.7B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CB
CB
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
$4.1B
$6.6B
Q3 25
$3.6B
$4.5B
Q2 25
$3.6B
$2.0B
Q1 25
$1.6B
$-973.0M
Q4 24
$4.6B
$6.3B
Q3 24
$4.3B
$4.9B
Q2 24
$4.1B
$2.4B
Q1 24
$3.2B
$-1.0B
Free Cash Flow
CB
CB
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
$4.7B
Q3 25
$3.5B
Q2 25
$1.1B
Q1 25
$-1.6B
Q4 24
$3.8B
Q3 24
$3.8B
Q2 24
$1.3B
Q1 24
$-1.7B
FCF Margin
CB
CB
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
16.0%
Q3 25
14.5%
Q2 25
4.7%
Q1 25
-8.8%
Q4 24
13.7%
Q3 24
16.1%
Q2 24
5.6%
Q1 24
-9.1%
Capex Intensity
CB
CB
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
6.5%
Q3 25
4.1%
Q2 25
4.0%
Q1 25
3.4%
Q4 24
8.9%
Q3 24
4.9%
Q2 24
4.8%
Q1 24
3.4%
Cash Conversion
CB
CB
PEP
PEP
Q4 25
1.26×
2.61×
Q3 25
1.30×
1.72×
Q2 25
1.20×
1.56×
Q1 25
1.18×
-0.53×
Q4 24
1.77×
4.13×
Q3 24
1.86×
1.67×
Q2 24
1.83×
0.76×
Q1 24
1.50×
-0.51×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CB
CB

Segment breakdown not available.

PEP
PEP

Pepsi Co Foods North America$8.3B28%
Pepsi Co Beverages North America$8.2B28%
Europe Middle East Africa Segment$6.1B21%
Latin America Foods Segment$3.7B13%
International Beverage Franchise$1.6B5%
Asia Pacific Foods Segment$1.5B5%

Related Comparisons