vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) and Sezzle Inc. (SEZL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sezzle Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($135.5M vs $58.8M, roughly 2.3× CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.). Sezzle Inc. runs the higher net margin — 37.9% vs -12.5%, a 50.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (131.8% vs 29.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Sezzle Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (111.9% CAGR vs -0.0%).
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is a global supplier of lithium-ion battery products including high-performance cells, modules and battery packs. It serves key segments such as electric vehicles, stationary energy storage systems and consumer electronics, with core operations in China and a worldwide customer base.
Sezzle is a publicly traded financial technology company headquartered in Minneapolis, U.S, with operations in the United States and Canada. The company provides an alternative payment platform offering interest-free installment plans at selected online stores. As of June 2021, the Sezzle platform had over 10 million user sign-ups and over 48,000 participating merchants.
CBAT vs SEZL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $58.8M | $135.5M |
| Net Profit | $-7.4M | $51.3M |
| Gross Margin | 7.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -13.6% | 50.9% |
| Net Margin | -12.5% | 37.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 131.8% | 29.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -63.6% | 41.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.08 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $135.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $58.8M | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.9M | $57.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.5M | $52.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.9M | $48.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.4M | $48.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.6M | $35.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.8M | $30.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-7.4M | $42.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | $26.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.1M | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $36.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.5M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.6K | $15.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4M | $29.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -13.6% | 70.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.6% | 61.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.7% | 69.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.0% | 63.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.9% | 58.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 55.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -12.5% | 54.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 46.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.6% | 53.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.5% | 75.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.8% | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.5% | 98.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.08 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $0.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $1.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $0.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $112.7M | $196.7M |
| Total Assets | $426.2M | $454.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.04× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.3M | $64.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.7M | $88.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6M | $88.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.0M | $73.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.2M | $80.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.1M | $58.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $196.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.7M | $169.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.4M | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.2M | $130.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.8M | $125.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.7M | $87.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $131.2M | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.6M | $50.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $454.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $426.2M | $400.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $363.9M | $367.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $350.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.5M | $298.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $302.2M | $298.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $293.5M | $252.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.6M | $212.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 27.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 23.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $3.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.8M | $70.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.6M | $63.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $23.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.6M | $52.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.6M | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.7M | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $22.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | $70.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0M | $63.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.3M | $52.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.5M | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | $22.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.3% | 90.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 110.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 43.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -63.9% | 108.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.5% | 118.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.1% | 98.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 73.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.51× | 2.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1115.72× | 2.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.46× | 0.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBAT
| Manufacturing Lithium Batteries | $28.0M | 48% |
| Residential Energy Supply And Uninterruptable Supplies | $17.8M | 30% |
| Light Electric Vehicles | $12.9M | 22% |
| Precursor | $108.0K | 0% |
SEZL
Segment breakdown not available.