vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ceribell, Inc. (CBLL) and First Foundation Inc. (FFWM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
First Foundation Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($48.4M vs $24.8M, roughly 2.0× Ceribell, Inc.). Ceribell, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -54.6% vs -97.9%, a 43.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. Ceribell, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-11.0M vs $-35.2M).
Ceribell, Inc. develops and commercializes innovative portable neurodiagnostic medical devices, focused on rapid non-invasive electroencephalogram (EEG) solutions for seizure detection. Its core products serve hospital emergency departments, intensive care units, and long-term care facilities, with primary markets across North America and ongoing global expansion efforts.
John B. Lacson Colleges Foundation (Bacolod), Inc. is a private maritime college in Bacolod, Negros Occidental, Philippines.
CBLL vs FFWM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $24.8M | $48.4M |
| Net Profit | $-13.5M | $-8.0M |
| Gross Margin | 87.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -58.9% | -97.5% |
| Net Margin | -54.6% | -97.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 421.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 43.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $24.8M | $48.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $63.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.2M | $51.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.5M | $71.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.2M | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $57.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $51.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-13.5M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $-146.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.6M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-14.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.4M | $-82.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $793.0K |
| Q4 25 | 87.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 88.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 87.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 87.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -58.9% | -97.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -64.8% | -92.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -70.5% | -21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -69.3% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -247.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -57.8% | -1276.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.2% |
| Q4 25 | -54.6% | -97.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -59.6% | -230.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -64.4% | -15.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -62.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -152.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -60.6% | -896.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.37 | $-1.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.36 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.85 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $159.3M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $155.3M | $912.6M |
| Total Assets | $195.8M | $11.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $159.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $155.3M | $912.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.1M | $917.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $180.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-136.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $933.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $928.7M |
| Q4 25 | $195.8M | $11.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $199.5M | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.7M | $11.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $213.5M | $12.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.1M | $13.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $13.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-10.8M | $-31.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.0M | $-35.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -44.2% | -72.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 6.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-41.6M | $-45.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-10.8M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.1M | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $-552.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-8.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-9.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.0M | $-35.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.5M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.6M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.6M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-11.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-9.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.9M |
| Q4 25 | -44.2% | -72.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.8% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.9% | -32.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -56.4% | -3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -123.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 146.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -16.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.08× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.96× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.09× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBLL
| Products | $18.8M | 76% |
| Subscription | $6.0M | 24% |
FFWM
Segment breakdown not available.
