vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ceribell, Inc. (CBLL) and Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.9M vs $24.8M, roughly 1.1× Ceribell, Inc.). Ceribell, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -54.6% vs -112.0%, a 57.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. Ceribell, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-11.0M vs $-56.2M).
Ceribell, Inc. develops and commercializes innovative portable neurodiagnostic medical devices, focused on rapid non-invasive electroencephalogram (EEG) solutions for seizure detection. Its core products serve hospital emergency departments, intensive care units, and long-term care facilities, with primary markets across North America and ongoing global expansion efforts.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
CBLL vs GPUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $24.8M | $26.9M |
| Net Profit | $-13.5M | $-30.1M |
| Gross Margin | 87.3% | 14.5% |
| Operating Margin | -58.9% | -117.8% |
| Net Margin | -54.6% | -112.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 38.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -6670.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $24.8M | $26.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.2M | $25.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.5M | $25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.2M | $31.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $38.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-13.5M | $-30.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.6M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-445.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.4M | $-25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | 87.3% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.3% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 88.1% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 87.9% | 21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 87.3% | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 47.4% |
| Q4 25 | -58.9% | -117.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -64.8% | -57.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -70.5% | -39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -69.3% | -25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -46.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -57.8% | -79.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -151.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | -54.6% | -112.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -59.6% | -53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -64.4% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -62.4% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -60.6% | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -190.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.37 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $-2.66 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.36 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-8.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.85 | $-24.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-37.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $159.3M | $13.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $83.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $155.3M | $119.8M |
| Total Assets | $195.8M | $313.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $159.3M | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.5M | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.4M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.7M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.1M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $88.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $92.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $96.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $104.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $106.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.0M |
| Q4 25 | $155.3M | $119.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.1M | $55.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.2M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $180.9M | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-136.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $59.0M |
| Q4 25 | $195.8M | $313.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $199.5M | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.7M | $213.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $213.5M | $218.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.1M | $231.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $270.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $299.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.51× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-10.8M | $-37.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.0M | $-56.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -44.2% | -208.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 68.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-41.6M | $-87.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-10.8M | $-37.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.1M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-10.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.0M | $-56.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.5M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.6M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.6M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-11.6M |
| Q4 25 | -44.2% | -208.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.8% | -84.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.9% | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -56.4% | -27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -47.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -33.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -30.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 68.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBLL
| Products | $18.8M | 76% |
| Subscription | $6.0M | 24% |
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |
