vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ceribell, Inc. (CBLL) and Massimo Group (MAMO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ceribell, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($24.8M vs $21.0M, roughly 1.2× Massimo Group). Massimo Group runs the higher net margin — 9.5% vs -54.6%, a 64.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Ceribell, Inc. develops and commercializes innovative portable neurodiagnostic medical devices, focused on rapid non-invasive electroencephalogram (EEG) solutions for seizure detection. Its core products serve hospital emergency departments, intensive care units, and long-term care facilities, with primary markets across North America and ongoing global expansion efforts.
Massimo Dutti, S.A. is a Spanish premium clothing retailer specializing in cashmere and wool products, established in 1985 and owned by Spanish multinational company Inditex, the parent company of Zara, Pull&Bear, and other brands.
CBLL vs MAMO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $24.8M | $21.0M |
| Net Profit | $-13.5M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | 87.3% | 41.5% |
| Operating Margin | -58.9% | 13.1% |
| Net Margin | -54.6% | 9.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 215.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $24.8M | $21.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.2M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.5M | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.2M | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $35.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-13.5M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.6M | $77.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.4M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.2M |
| Q4 25 | 87.3% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.3% | 42.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 88.1% | 36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 87.9% | 28.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 87.3% | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 34.7% |
| Q4 25 | -58.9% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -64.8% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -70.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -69.3% | -18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -15.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -57.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.2% |
| Q4 25 | -54.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -59.6% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -64.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -62.4% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -60.6% | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.37 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.85 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $159.3M | $5.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $155.3M | $23.7M |
| Total Assets | $195.8M | $51.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $159.3M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.5M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.7M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $155.3M | $23.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.1M | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.2M | $20.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $180.9M | $19.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-136.0M | $22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.1M |
| Q4 25 | $195.8M | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $199.5M | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.7M | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $213.5M | $46.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $54.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.1M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $47.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-10.8M | $4.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -44.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.01× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-41.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-10.8M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.1M | $633.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-637.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-11.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-6.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-741.4K |
| Q4 25 | -44.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -56.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -19.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -17.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBLL
| Products | $18.8M | 76% |
| Subscription | $6.0M | 24% |
MAMO
Segment breakdown not available.
