vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ceribell, Inc. (CBLL) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.4M vs $24.8M, roughly 1.6× Ceribell, Inc.). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC runs the higher net margin — 54.9% vs -54.6%, a 109.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.4M vs $-11.0M).
Ceribell, Inc. develops and commercializes innovative portable neurodiagnostic medical devices, focused on rapid non-invasive electroencephalogram (EEG) solutions for seizure detection. Its core products serve hospital emergency departments, intensive care units, and long-term care facilities, with primary markets across North America and ongoing global expansion efforts.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
CBLL vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $24.8M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | $-13.5M | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | 87.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -58.9% | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | -54.6% | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $24.8M | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.2M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.5M | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.2M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-13.5M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.6M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.4M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | 87.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 88.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 87.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 87.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -58.9% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -64.8% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -70.5% | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -69.3% | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -57.8% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | -54.6% | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -59.6% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -64.4% | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -62.4% | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -60.6% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.37 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.36 | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.85 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $159.3M | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $155.3M | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | $195.8M | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $159.3M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.5M | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.4M | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.7M | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.1M | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | $155.3M | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.1M | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.2M | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $180.9M | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-136.0M | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $424.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $419.7M |
| Q4 25 | $195.8M | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $199.5M | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.7M | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $213.5M | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.1M | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $529.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $527.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-10.8M | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.0M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -44.2% | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-41.6M | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-10.8M | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.1M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.0M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.5M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.6M | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.6M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | -44.2% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.8% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.9% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -56.4% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBLL
| Products | $18.8M | 76% |
| Subscription | $6.0M | 24% |
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |
