vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ceribell, Inc. (CBLL) and SolarMax Technology, Inc. (SMXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SolarMax Technology, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.6M vs $24.8M, roughly 1.9× Ceribell, Inc.). SolarMax Technology, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1.9% vs -54.6%, a 52.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Ceribell, Inc. develops and commercializes innovative portable neurodiagnostic medical devices, focused on rapid non-invasive electroencephalogram (EEG) solutions for seizure detection. Its core products serve hospital emergency departments, intensive care units, and long-term care facilities, with primary markets across North America and ongoing global expansion efforts.
SolarMax Technology, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-efficiency solar PV modules and clean energy systems. It serves residential, commercial and industrial clients in North America and key Asia-Pacific markets, offering installation and after-sales support to boost low-carbon energy use.
CBLL vs SMXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $24.8M | $46.6M |
| Net Profit | $-13.5M | $-872.2K |
| Gross Margin | 87.3% | 2.7% |
| Operating Margin | -58.9% | -2.7% |
| Net Margin | -54.6% | -1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 623.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 77.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $24.8M | $46.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.2M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.5M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.2M | $6.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-13.5M | $-872.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.6M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.4M | $-9.6M |
| Q4 25 | 87.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.3% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 88.1% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 87.9% | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 87.3% | 19.9% |
| Q4 25 | -58.9% | -2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -64.8% | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -70.5% | -25.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -69.3% | -16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -57.8% | -158.4% |
| Q4 25 | -54.6% | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -59.6% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -64.4% | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -62.4% | -18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -60.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -60.6% | -152.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.37 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.85 | $-0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $159.3M | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $155.3M | $-12.2M |
| Total Assets | $195.8M | $91.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $159.3M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.5M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.4M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.7M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.1M | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | $155.3M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.1M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.2M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $180.9M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-15.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-136.0M | $-10.9M |
| Q4 25 | $195.8M | $91.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $199.5M | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.7M | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $213.5M | $38.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.1M | $43.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-10.8M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -44.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-41.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-10.8M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.1M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $220.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $-601.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $203.6K |
| Q4 25 | $-11.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -44.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -56.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBLL
| Products | $18.8M | 76% |
| Subscription | $6.0M | 24% |
SMXT
| Yabucoa | $35.9M | 77% |
| Other | $10.7M | 23% |
