vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ceribell, Inc. (CBLL) and YORK WATER CO (YORW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ceribell, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($24.8M vs $19.4M, roughly 1.3× YORK WATER CO). YORK WATER CO runs the higher net margin — 26.7% vs -54.6%, a 81.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Ceribell, Inc. develops and commercializes innovative portable neurodiagnostic medical devices, focused on rapid non-invasive electroencephalogram (EEG) solutions for seizure detection. Its core products serve hospital emergency departments, intensive care units, and long-term care facilities, with primary markets across North America and ongoing global expansion efforts.
The York Water Company is an investor-owned, public utility company based in York, Pennsylvania and operating throughout Pennsylvania. The company was founded in 1816 by a group of local businessmen concerned about fire protection.
CBLL vs YORW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $24.8M | $19.4M |
| Net Profit | $-13.5M | $5.2M |
| Gross Margin | 87.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -58.9% | 33.2% |
| Net Margin | -54.6% | 26.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 0.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $24.8M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.2M | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.5M | $18.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.2M | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-13.5M | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.6M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.4M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.3M |
| Q4 25 | 87.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 88.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 87.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 87.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -58.9% | 33.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -64.8% | 39.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -70.5% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -69.3% | 34.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -57.8% | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 35.5% |
| Q4 25 | -54.6% | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -59.6% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -64.4% | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -62.4% | 19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -60.6% | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.37 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.36 | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.85 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $159.3M | $1.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $155.3M | $240.3M |
| Total Assets | $195.8M | $680.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $159.3M | $1.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.5M | $1.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.4M | $1.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.7M | $1.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.1M | $1.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | $155.3M | $240.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.1M | $238.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.2M | $234.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $180.9M | $232.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $231.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-136.0M | $228.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $225.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $222.9M |
| Q4 25 | $195.8M | $680.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $199.5M | $667.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.7M | $653.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $213.5M | $641.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $633.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.1M | $621.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $610.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $602.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-10.8M | $8.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -44.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.63× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-41.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-10.8M | $8.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.1M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -44.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -56.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBLL
| Products | $18.8M | 76% |
| Subscription | $6.0M | 24% |
YORW
Segment breakdown not available.
