vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC (CBRL) and KAISER ALUMINUM CORP (KALU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KAISER ALUMINUM CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($929.0M vs $797.2M, roughly 1.2× CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC). KAISER ALUMINUM CORP runs the higher net margin — 3.0% vs -3.1%, a 6.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KAISER ALUMINUM CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs -10.9%). KAISER ALUMINUM CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-51.1M vs $-88.9M). Over the past eight quarters, KAISER ALUMINUM CORP's revenue compounded faster (12.2% CAGR vs -2.4%).
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc., doing business as Cracker Barrel, is an American chain of restaurant and gift stores with a Southern country theme. The company's headquarters are in Lebanon, Tennessee, where Cracker Barrel was founded by Dan Evins and Tommy Lowe in 1969. The chain's early locations were positioned near Interstate Highway exits in the Southeastern and Midwestern United States, but expanded across the country during the 1990s and 2000s. As of August 10, 2023, the compan...
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation is an American aluminum producer. It is a spinoff from Kaiser Aluminum and Chemicals Corporation, which came to be when common stock was offered in Permanente Metals Corporation and Permanente Metals Corporation's name was changed to Kaiser Aluminum and Chemicals Corporation.
CBRL vs KALU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $797.2M | $929.0M |
| Net Profit | $-24.6M | $28.2M |
| Gross Margin | 68.8% | 13.3% |
| Operating Margin | -4.1% | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | -3.1% | 3.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.9% | 21.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -235.7% | 42.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.10 | $1.67 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $797.2M | $929.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $843.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $821.1M | $823.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $949.4M | $777.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $765.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $894.4M | $747.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $817.1M | $773.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $935.4M | $737.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-24.6M | $28.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.6M | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.2M | $21.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.1M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.2M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.5M | $18.2M |
| Q4 25 | 68.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.9% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 67.4% | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.6% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 66.3% | 11.7% |
| Q4 25 | -4.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | -3.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.10 | $1.67 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.56 | $1.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.99 | $1.31 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.80 | $0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.41 | $1.15 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.19 | $1.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.9M | $7.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $428.8M | $826.1M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.9M | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8M | $13.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3M | $21.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0M | $45.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.9M | $70.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.6M | $101.6M |
| Q4 25 | $428.8M | $826.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $806.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $469.3M | $776.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $460.9M | $756.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $743.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $440.1M | $729.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $426.6M | $727.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $462.0M | $714.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $2.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-53.4M | $-20.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-88.9M | $-51.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.2% | -5.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.5% | 3.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-25.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-53.4M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $59.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.0M | $15.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $57.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $43.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.5M | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.6M | $26.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.7M | $63.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-88.9M | $-51.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.6M | $-27.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | $-17.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.9M | $33.3M |
| Q4 25 | -11.2% | -5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 4.5% |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.83× | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.83× | 3.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.93× | 3.48× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBRL
| Restaurant | $650.6M | 82% |
| Retail | $146.6M | 18% |
KALU
| Packaging | $440.6M | 47% |
| Aero Hs Products | $213.0M | 23% |
| Transferred Over Time | $200.2M | 22% |
| Automotive Extrusions | $75.4M | 8% |
