vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC (CBRL) and Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($797.2M vs $736.0M, roughly 1.1× Opendoor Technologies Inc.). CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC runs the higher net margin — -3.1% vs -148.9%, a 145.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-10.9% vs -32.1%). Opendoor Technologies Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($67.0M vs $-88.9M). Over the past eight quarters, CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC's revenue compounded faster (-2.4% CAGR vs -21.1%).
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc., doing business as Cracker Barrel, is an American chain of restaurant and gift stores with a Southern country theme. The company's headquarters are in Lebanon, Tennessee, where Cracker Barrel was founded by Dan Evins and Tommy Lowe in 1969. The chain's early locations were positioned near Interstate Highway exits in the Southeastern and Midwestern United States, but expanded across the country during the 1990s and 2000s. As of August 10, 2023, the compan...
Opendoor Technologies Inc. is an online company that buys and sells residential real estate. Headquartered in San Francisco, it makes instant cash offers on homes through an online process, makes repairs on the properties it purchases and re-lists them for sale. It also provides mobile application-based home buying services along with financing. As of November 2021, the company operates in 44 markets in the US.
CBRL vs OPEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $797.2M | $736.0M |
| Net Profit | $-24.6M | $-1.1B |
| Gross Margin | 68.8% | 7.7% |
| Operating Margin | -4.1% | -20.4% |
| Net Margin | -3.1% | -148.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.9% | -32.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -235.7% | -869.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.10 | $-1.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $797.2M | $736.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $915.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $821.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $949.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $894.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $817.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $935.4M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $-24.6M | $-1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-90.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.6M | $-29.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.2M | $-85.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-113.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.1M | $-78.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.2M | $-92.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.5M | $-109.0M |
| Q4 25 | 68.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.9% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 67.4% | 8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.0% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 66.3% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | -4.1% | -20.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | -4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | -4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | -7.4% |
| Q4 25 | -3.1% | -148.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | -7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.1% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | -9.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.10 | $-1.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.56 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.99 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.80 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.41 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.19 | $-0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.9M | $962.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $428.8M | $1.0B |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.9M | $962.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $962.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8M | $789.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3M | $559.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $679.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0M | $837.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.9M | $809.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.6M | $990.0M |
| Q4 25 | $428.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $811.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $469.3M | $631.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $460.9M | $645.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $713.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $440.1M | $801.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $426.6M | $845.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $462.0M | $899.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $3.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-53.4M | $70.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-88.9M | $67.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.2% | 9.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.5% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-53.4M | $70.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $435.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.0M | $823.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-279.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-80.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.5M | $62.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.6M | $-399.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.7M | $-178.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-88.9M | $67.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $432.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.6M | $821.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-283.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-83.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $56.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | $-407.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.9M | $-186.0M |
| Q4 25 | -11.2% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 52.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | -26.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | -15.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.83× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.93× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBRL
| Restaurant | $650.6M | 82% |
| Retail | $146.6M | 18% |
OPEN
Segment breakdown not available.
