vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC (CBRL) and ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (ORA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($797.2M vs $403.9M, roughly 2.0× ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.). ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 10.9% vs -3.1%, a 14.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (75.8% vs -10.9%). Over the past eight quarters, ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (37.7% CAGR vs -2.4%).
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc., doing business as Cracker Barrel, is an American chain of restaurant and gift stores with a Southern country theme. The company's headquarters are in Lebanon, Tennessee, where Cracker Barrel was founded by Dan Evins and Tommy Lowe in 1969. The chain's early locations were positioned near Interstate Highway exits in the Southeastern and Midwestern United States, but expanded across the country during the 1990s and 2000s. As of August 10, 2023, the compan...
Ormat Technologies, Inc. is an international company based in Reno, Nevada, United States. Ormat supplies alternative and renewable geothermal energy technology. The company has built over 190 power plants and installed over 3,200 MW of output. As of January 2021 it owns and operates 933 MW of geothermal and recovered energy based power plants. Ormat has supplied over 1000 turbochargers worldwide, in North America, South America, Europe, Australia, and Asia. The company's products also includ...
CBRL vs ORA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $797.2M | $403.9M |
| Net Profit | $-24.6M | $44.1M |
| Gross Margin | 68.8% | 29.8% |
| Operating Margin | -4.1% | 19.9% |
| Net Margin | -3.1% | 10.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.9% | 75.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -235.7% | 9.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.10 | $0.71 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $403.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $797.2M | $276.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $249.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $821.1M | $234.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $949.4M | $229.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $230.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $894.4M | $211.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $817.1M | $213.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $44.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-24.6M | $31.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.6M | $28.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.2M | $40.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.1M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.2M | $22.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 68.8% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.9% | 24.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 67.4% | 31.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.6% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.0% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.1% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 16.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.1% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.1% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.71 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.10 | $0.51 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.56 | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.99 | $0.66 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.67 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.80 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.41 | $0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.9M | $654.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $428.8M | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $6.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $654.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.9M | $147.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $79.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8M | $88.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3M | $112.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $94.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0M | $88.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.9M | $66.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $428.8M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $469.3M | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $460.9M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $440.1M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $426.6M | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $6.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $5.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-53.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-88.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-53.4M | $105.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.0M | $96.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $88.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $158.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.5M | $106.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.6M | $30.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-88.9M | $-40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-102.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.6M | $-37.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-104.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | $-116.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -11.2% | -14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -40.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | -16.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -45.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | -54.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 52.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 59.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 57.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 83.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | 51.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 69.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.83× | 3.45× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.89× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.83× | 4.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.38× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBRL
| Restaurant | $650.6M | 82% |
| Retail | $146.6M | 18% |
ORA
| Electricity | $181.6M | 45% |
| Product | $177.4M | 44% |
| Energy storage | $44.9M | 11% |
