vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of CABOT CORP (CBT) and BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC (EAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $849.0M, roughly 1.7× CABOT CORP). BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC runs the higher net margin — 8.7% vs 8.6%, a 0.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -11.1%). Over the past eight quarters, BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC's revenue compounded faster (10.3% CAGR vs -8.7%).

Cabot Corporation is an American specialty chemicals and performance materials company headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts. The company operates in over 20 countries with 36 manufacturing plants, eight research and development facilities, and 28 sales offices.

Brinker International, Inc. is an American multinational hospitality industry company that owns Chili's and Maggiano's Little Italy restaurant chains. Founded in 1975 and based in Dallas, Texas, Brinker currently owns, operates, or franchises 1,672 restaurants under the names Chili's Grill & Bar and Maggiano's Little Italy worldwide.

CBT vs EAT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
EAT
EAT
1.7× larger
EAT
$1.5B
$849.0M
CBT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
EAT
EAT
+14.3% gap
EAT
3.2%
-11.1%
CBT
Higher net margin
EAT
EAT
0.1% more per $
EAT
8.7%
8.6%
CBT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
EAT
EAT
Annualised
EAT
10.3%
-8.7%
CBT

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
CBT
CBT
EAT
EAT
Revenue
$849.0M
$1.5B
Net Profit
$73.0M
$127.9M
Gross Margin
24.9%
Operating Margin
15.2%
11.3%
Net Margin
8.6%
8.7%
Revenue YoY
-11.1%
3.2%
Net Profit YoY
-21.5%
EPS (diluted)
$1.37
$2.87

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CBT
CBT
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$1.5B
Q4 25
$849.0M
$1.5B
Q3 25
$899.0M
$1.3B
Q2 25
$923.0M
$1.5B
Q1 25
$936.0M
$1.4B
Q4 24
$955.0M
$1.4B
Q3 24
$1.0B
$1.1B
Q2 24
$1.0B
$1.2B
Net Profit
CBT
CBT
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$127.9M
Q4 25
$73.0M
$128.5M
Q3 25
$43.0M
$99.5M
Q2 25
$101.0M
$107.0M
Q1 25
$94.0M
$119.1M
Q4 24
$93.0M
$118.5M
Q3 24
$137.0M
$38.5M
Q2 24
$109.0M
$57.3M
Gross Margin
CBT
CBT
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
24.9%
Q3 25
24.5%
Q2 25
26.4%
Q1 25
25.7%
Q4 24
24.6%
Q3 24
24.0%
Q2 24
25.2%
Operating Margin
CBT
CBT
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
11.3%
Q4 25
15.2%
11.6%
Q3 25
15.2%
8.7%
Q2 25
18.1%
9.8%
Q1 25
17.3%
11.0%
Q4 24
16.2%
11.5%
Q3 24
15.0%
5.0%
Q2 24
16.9%
6.1%
Net Margin
CBT
CBT
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
8.7%
Q4 25
8.6%
8.8%
Q3 25
4.8%
7.4%
Q2 25
10.9%
7.3%
Q1 25
10.0%
8.4%
Q4 24
9.7%
8.7%
Q3 24
13.7%
3.4%
Q2 24
10.7%
4.7%
EPS (diluted)
CBT
CBT
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$2.87
Q4 25
$1.37
$2.86
Q3 25
$0.80
$2.17
Q2 25
$1.86
$2.31
Q1 25
$1.69
$2.56
Q4 24
$1.67
$2.61
Q3 24
$2.41
$0.84
Q2 24
$1.94
$1.22

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CBT
CBT
EAT
EAT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$230.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$424.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.6B
$406.0M
Total Assets
$3.8B
$2.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.05×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CBT
CBT
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$230.0M
$15.0M
Q3 25
$258.0M
$33.6M
Q2 25
$239.0M
$18.9M
Q1 25
$213.0M
$17.5M
Q4 24
$183.0M
$14.8M
Q3 24
$223.0M
$16.2M
Q2 24
$197.0M
$64.6M
Total Debt
CBT
CBT
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$424.4M
Q4 25
$451.3M
Q3 25
$1.1B
$525.8M
Q2 25
$426.0M
Q1 25
$518.3M
Q4 24
$652.0M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$806.9M
Q2 24
$786.3M
Stockholders' Equity
CBT
CBT
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$406.0M
Q4 25
$1.6B
$379.3M
Q3 25
$1.6B
$343.9M
Q2 25
$1.5B
$370.9M
Q1 25
$1.4B
$259.0M
Q4 24
$1.4B
$131.5M
Q3 24
$1.4B
$12.7M
Q2 24
$1.3B
$39.4M
Total Assets
CBT
CBT
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$2.8B
Q4 25
$3.8B
$2.7B
Q3 25
$3.8B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$3.8B
$2.7B
Q1 25
$3.8B
$2.6B
Q4 24
$3.6B
$2.6B
Q3 24
$3.7B
$2.5B
Q2 24
$3.6B
$2.6B
Debt / Equity
CBT
CBT
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
1.05×
Q4 25
1.19×
Q3 25
0.70×
1.53×
Q2 25
1.15×
Q1 25
2.00×
Q4 24
4.96×
Q3 24
0.75×
63.54×
Q2 24
19.96×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CBT
CBT
EAT
EAT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$126.0M
$571.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$57.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
6.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
8.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.73×
4.47×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$401.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CBT
CBT
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$571.8M
Q4 25
$126.0M
$218.9M
Q3 25
$219.0M
$120.8M
Q2 25
$249.0M
$186.0M
Q1 25
$73.0M
$212.0M
Q4 24
$124.0M
$218.2M
Q3 24
$204.0M
$62.8M
Q2 24
$207.0M
$141.5M
Free Cash Flow
CBT
CBT
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$57.0M
$155.2M
Q3 25
$155.0M
$62.2M
Q2 25
$188.0M
$106.1M
Q1 25
$1.0M
$132.4M
Q4 24
$47.0M
$168.9M
Q3 24
$112.0M
$6.3M
Q2 24
$155.0M
$83.5M
FCF Margin
CBT
CBT
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
6.7%
10.7%
Q3 25
17.2%
4.6%
Q2 25
20.4%
7.3%
Q1 25
0.1%
9.3%
Q4 24
4.9%
12.4%
Q3 24
11.2%
0.6%
Q2 24
15.3%
6.9%
Capex Intensity
CBT
CBT
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
8.1%
4.4%
Q3 25
7.1%
4.3%
Q2 25
6.6%
5.5%
Q1 25
7.7%
5.6%
Q4 24
8.1%
3.6%
Q3 24
9.2%
5.0%
Q2 24
5.1%
4.8%
Cash Conversion
CBT
CBT
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
4.47×
Q4 25
1.73×
1.70×
Q3 25
5.09×
1.21×
Q2 25
2.47×
1.74×
Q1 25
0.78×
1.78×
Q4 24
1.33×
1.84×
Q3 24
1.49×
1.63×
Q2 24
1.90×
2.47×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CBT
CBT

Reinforcement Materials$520.0M61%
Performance Chemicals$300.0M35%
Shipping And Handling$25.0M3%
Other Products And Services$4.0M0%

EAT
EAT

Company sales$1.5B99%
Franchise revenues$14.7M1%

Related Comparisons