vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of COMMUNITY FINANCIAL SYSTEM, INC. (CBU) and PAR TECHNOLOGY CORP (PAR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

COMMUNITY FINANCIAL SYSTEM, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($214.5M vs $120.1M, roughly 1.8× PAR TECHNOLOGY CORP). On growth, PAR TECHNOLOGY CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.4% vs 8.7%). Over the past eight quarters, PAR TECHNOLOGY CORP's revenue compounded faster (30.9% CAGR vs 7.9%).

Community Health Systems (CHS) is a Fortune 500 company based in Franklin, Tennessee. It was the largest provider of general hospital healthcare services in the United States in terms of number of acute care facilities. In 2014, CHS had around 200 hospitals, but the number had declined to around 85 in 2021.

PAR Technology Corp is a global provider of point-of-sale systems, restaurant management software, and integrated tech solutions. Its core segments serve food service, hospitality, and government security markets, offering cloud tools to streamline operations, enhance customer experiences, and boost efficiency for enterprise and small-to-medium clients.

CBU vs PAR — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CBU
CBU
1.8× larger
CBU
$214.5M
$120.1M
PAR
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PAR
PAR
+5.7% gap
PAR
14.4%
8.7%
CBU
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PAR
PAR
Annualised
PAR
30.9%
7.9%
CBU

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CBU
CBU
PAR
PAR
Revenue
$214.5M
$120.1M
Net Profit
$57.2M
Gross Margin
41.2%
Operating Margin
-15.0%
Net Margin
26.7%
Revenue YoY
8.7%
14.4%
Net Profit YoY
15.3%
EPS (diluted)
$1.15
$-0.52

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CBU
CBU
PAR
PAR
Q1 26
$214.5M
Q4 25
$217.0M
$120.1M
Q3 25
$208.1M
$119.2M
Q2 25
$200.5M
$112.4M
Q1 25
$197.3M
$103.9M
Q4 24
$197.4M
$105.0M
Q3 24
$190.3M
$96.8M
Q2 24
$184.3M
$78.2M
Net Profit
CBU
CBU
PAR
PAR
Q1 26
$57.2M
Q4 25
$54.4M
Q3 25
$55.1M
$-18.2M
Q2 25
$51.3M
$-21.0M
Q1 25
$49.6M
$-24.4M
Q4 24
$49.8M
Q3 24
$43.9M
$-19.8M
Q2 24
$47.9M
$54.2M
Gross Margin
CBU
CBU
PAR
PAR
Q1 26
Q4 25
41.2%
Q3 25
41.3%
Q2 25
45.4%
Q1 25
46.5%
Q4 24
42.9%
Q3 24
44.5%
Q2 24
41.0%
Operating Margin
CBU
CBU
PAR
PAR
Q1 26
Q4 25
33.1%
-15.0%
Q3 25
35.2%
-14.8%
Q2 25
32.9%
-15.4%
Q1 25
32.6%
-15.2%
Q4 24
32.7%
-15.6%
Q3 24
30.0%
-15.7%
Q2 24
33.7%
-26.5%
Net Margin
CBU
CBU
PAR
PAR
Q1 26
26.7%
Q4 25
25.1%
Q3 25
26.5%
-15.3%
Q2 25
25.6%
-18.7%
Q1 25
25.1%
-23.4%
Q4 24
25.2%
Q3 24
23.1%
-20.5%
Q2 24
26.0%
69.3%
EPS (diluted)
CBU
CBU
PAR
PAR
Q1 26
$1.15
Q4 25
$1.03
$-0.52
Q3 25
$1.04
$-0.45
Q2 25
$0.97
$-0.52
Q1 25
$0.93
$-0.60
Q4 24
$0.94
$-0.56
Q3 24
$0.83
$-0.56
Q2 24
$0.91
$1.60

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CBU
CBU
PAR
PAR
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$572.2M
$80.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$394.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.0B
$825.1M
Total Assets
$17.5B
$1.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.48×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CBU
CBU
PAR
PAR
Q1 26
$572.2M
Q4 25
$301.8M
$80.1M
Q3 25
$245.2M
$93.0M
Q2 25
$237.2M
$85.7M
Q1 25
$518.0M
$92.2M
Q4 24
$197.0M
$108.6M
Q3 24
$346.1M
$118.4M
Q2 24
$201.5M
$142.5M
Total Debt
CBU
CBU
PAR
PAR
Q1 26
Q4 25
$394.0M
Q3 25
$393.4M
Q2 25
$392.8M
Q1 25
$392.3M
Q4 24
$990.2M
$368.4M
Q3 24
$466.7M
Q2 24
$378.7M
Stockholders' Equity
CBU
CBU
PAR
PAR
Q1 26
$2.0B
Q4 25
$2.0B
$825.1M
Q3 25
$1.9B
$838.0M
Q2 25
$1.9B
$859.1M
Q1 25
$1.8B
$852.0M
Q4 24
$1.8B
$871.7M
Q3 24
$1.8B
$692.7M
Q2 24
$1.7B
$588.3M
Total Assets
CBU
CBU
PAR
PAR
Q1 26
$17.5B
Q4 25
$17.3B
$1.4B
Q3 25
$17.0B
$1.4B
Q2 25
$16.7B
$1.4B
Q1 25
$16.8B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$16.4B
$1.4B
Q3 24
$16.4B
$1.3B
Q2 24
$15.9B
$1.1B
Debt / Equity
CBU
CBU
PAR
PAR
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.48×
Q3 25
0.47×
Q2 25
0.46×
Q1 25
0.46×
Q4 24
0.56×
0.42×
Q3 24
0.67×
Q2 24
0.64×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CBU
CBU
PAR
PAR
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-11.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-12.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-10.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-30.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CBU
CBU
PAR
PAR
Q1 26
Q4 25
$301.9M
$-11.8M
Q3 25
$101.1M
$8.4M
Q2 25
$53.7M
$-6.6M
Q1 25
$62.5M
$-17.2M
Q4 24
$242.3M
$3.4M
Q3 24
$56.9M
$8.8M
Q2 24
$39.8M
$-13.8M
Free Cash Flow
CBU
CBU
PAR
PAR
Q1 26
Q4 25
$233.3M
$-12.5M
Q3 25
$83.4M
$7.0M
Q2 25
$36.4M
$-7.4M
Q1 25
$52.0M
$-17.6M
Q4 24
$221.6M
$3.2M
Q3 24
$51.9M
$8.4M
Q2 24
$33.8M
$-14.2M
FCF Margin
CBU
CBU
PAR
PAR
Q1 26
Q4 25
107.5%
-10.4%
Q3 25
40.1%
5.9%
Q2 25
18.1%
-6.6%
Q1 25
26.3%
-16.9%
Q4 24
112.2%
3.0%
Q3 24
27.3%
8.7%
Q2 24
18.3%
-18.2%
Capex Intensity
CBU
CBU
PAR
PAR
Q1 26
Q4 25
31.6%
0.7%
Q3 25
8.5%
1.1%
Q2 25
8.6%
0.7%
Q1 25
5.3%
0.4%
Q4 24
10.5%
0.2%
Q3 24
2.6%
0.4%
Q2 24
3.3%
0.5%
Cash Conversion
CBU
CBU
PAR
PAR
Q1 26
Q4 25
5.55×
Q3 25
1.84×
Q2 25
1.05×
Q1 25
1.26×
Q4 24
4.87×
Q3 24
1.30×
Q2 24
0.83×
-0.26×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CBU
CBU

Segment breakdown not available.

PAR
PAR

Subscription Service$76.1M63%
Hardware$27.8M23%
Professional Service$16.2M13%

Related Comparisons