vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cibus, Inc. (CBUS) and Evogene Ltd. (EVGN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evogene Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.2M vs $1.1M, roughly 3.1× Cibus, Inc.). Evogene Ltd. runs the higher net margin — -237.7% vs -2959.9%, a 2722.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Evogene Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (40.7% vs -12.8%).
Cibus, Inc. is a leading agricultural biotechnology firm specializing in precision gene editing technologies to develop improved, sustainable crop traits. Its solutions include herbicide tolerance, disease and pest resistance, and enhanced yield characteristics for major row crops, serving global agricultural markets, seed producers, and farming communities to reduce environmental impact and boost operational efficiency.
Evogene is a computational chemistry company based in Israel, specializing in the generative design of small molecules for the pharmaceutical and agricultural industries. At the core of its technology is ChemPass AI, a proprietary generative AI engine that enables the design of novel, highly potent small molecules optimized across multiple critical parameters. This powerful platform significantly improves success rates while reducing development time and costs. Built on this powerful technolo...
CBUS vs EVGN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1M | $3.2M |
| Net Profit | $-31.3M | $-7.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.8% |
| Operating Margin | -2135.7% | -189.0% |
| Net Margin | -2959.9% | -237.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -12.8% | 40.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -35.4% | 22.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.39 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $615.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $933.0K | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $838.0K | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $545.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-31.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.4M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-23.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-180.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.9M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-23.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 71.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -2135.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2510.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1923.5% | -189.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4020.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1487.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -12023.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2563.5% | -409.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3385.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -2959.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3827.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2719.4% | -237.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4534.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1906.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -10795.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2969.3% | -428.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4300.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.39 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.44 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.61 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.34 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.94 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.63 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.14 | $-1.82 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.12 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $9.9M | $8.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $528.0K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $21.8M | $12.4M |
| Total Assets | $305.0M | $33.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.02× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.5M | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.0M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $528.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $662.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $21.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.1M | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $108.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $270.5M | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $278.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $330.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.2M | $33.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $335.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $350.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $367.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $553.4M | $41.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $533.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-13.4M | $-7.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-13.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1277.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-51.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-13.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.6M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-14.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-13.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.0M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-13.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-14.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-13.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | -1277.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1926.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1468.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1172.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1159.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -832.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2054.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2515.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 41.8% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
