vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chemours Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $721.6M, roughly 1.8× Celsius Holdings, Inc.). Celsius Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs -3.5%, a 7.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Celsius Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (117.2% vs -2.1%). Chemours Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.0M vs $-130.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.4% CAGR vs -1.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is an American company that produces a range of fitness and energy drinks under the brand name Celsius. The company's products are marketed as healthy, to which the CEO attributes the brand's success.
CC vs CELH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $721.6M |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $24.7M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 47.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 117.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | 231.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $721.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $725.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $739.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $329.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $332.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $265.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $402.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $355.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $24.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $-61.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $99.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $44.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $79.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.0M | $77.8M |
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 47.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | 51.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 51.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | 52.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 50.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 46.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 52.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | 51.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | 19.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | -5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 23.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | -8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | -5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 21.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $0.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | $0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | $398.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | $676.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | 0.57× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | $398.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | $806.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | $615.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $977.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $890.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $903.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $903.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $746.0M | $879.5M |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $676.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $870.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $871.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $443.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $399.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $423.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $415.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $753.0M | $338.2M |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | 0.57× | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.27× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | $-119.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | $-130.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | -18.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -4.83× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | $323.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $-119.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $331.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $43.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $103.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $75.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $39.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-290.0M | $134.6M |
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | $-130.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $321.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $35.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $96.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $70.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | $30.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-392.0M | $130.1M |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 44.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | 29.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.8% | 36.6% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.83× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | 0.50× | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.37× | 1.73× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
CELH
Segment breakdown not available.
