vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and General Enterprise Ventures, Inc. (CITR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chemours Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $288.2K, roughly 4614.7× General Enterprise Ventures, Inc.). Chemours Co runs the higher net margin — -3.5% vs -2751.2%, a 2747.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, General Enterprise Ventures, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (169.3% vs -2.1%). Chemours Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.0M vs $-1.5M). Over the past eight quarters, General Enterprise Ventures, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (28.4% CAGR vs -1.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
The Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) is an American multinational information technology company based in Spring, Texas. It is a business-focused organization which works in servers, storage, networking, containerization software and consulting and support. HPE was ranked No. 107 in the 2018 Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations by total revenue.
CC vs CITR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $288.2K |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $-7.9M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | -99.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -1470.3% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | -2751.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 169.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | -1110.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $-0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $288.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $687.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $969.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $107.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $198.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $433.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $-655.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $-907.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.0M | $-3.5M |
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | -99.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 46.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | 42.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | -30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 48.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | 79.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | -1470.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | -438.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -356.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -524.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | -456.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | -608.9% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | -2751.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | -1731.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | -1124.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -612.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | -456.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | -812.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $-0.59 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $8.5M |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $12.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $746.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $4.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $753.0M | $3.8M |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $9.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0B | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.27× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | $-1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | $-1.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | -525.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 18.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $-713.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $-551.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $-424.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-290.0M | $-343.7K |
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $-740.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-392.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | -525.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | -196.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | -76.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 20.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.37× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
CITR
Segment breakdown not available.
