vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEAN HARBORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.1× Chemours Co). CLEAN HARBORS INC runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs -3.5%, a 9.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CLEAN HARBORS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs -2.1%). CLEAN HARBORS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.3M vs $92.0M). Over the past eight quarters, CLEAN HARBORS INC's revenue compounded faster (4.4% CAGR vs -1.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
CC vs CLH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $86.6M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.6% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 4.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | 3.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $1.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $86.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $118.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $126.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $58.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $84.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $115.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $133.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.0M | $69.8M |
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 30.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | 32.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 31.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 33.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | 29.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | 13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 9.1% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $2.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $2.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $1.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $1.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $2.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $2.46 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | $1.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | $127.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $7.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | $127.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | $91.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | $98.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $105.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $102.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $82.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $91.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $746.0M | $104.8M |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $753.0M | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $7.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0B | $6.9B |
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.27× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | $355.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | $233.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | 15.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 8.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | $441.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $355.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $302.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $208.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $303.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $239.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $216.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-290.0M | $18.5M |
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | $233.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $207.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $118.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $-117.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $241.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $142.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | $80.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-392.0M | $-119.4M |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | -8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.8% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 8.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | 10.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.08× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | 1.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.37× | 0.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
