vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and Datadog (DDOG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chemours Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $953.2M, roughly 1.4× Datadog). Datadog runs the higher net margin — 4.9% vs -3.5%, a 8.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Datadog posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.2% vs -2.1%). Datadog produced more free cash flow last quarter ($318.2M vs $92.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Datadog's revenue compounded faster (24.9% CAGR vs -1.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
Datadog, Inc. is an American company that provides an observability service for cloud-scale applications, providing monitoring of servers, databases, tools, and services, through a SaaS-based data analytics platform. Founded and headquartered in New York City, the company is a publicly traded entity on the Nasdaq stock exchange.
CC vs DDOG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $953.2M |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $46.6M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 80.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 1.0% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 4.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 29.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | 2.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $953.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $885.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $826.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $761.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $737.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $690.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $645.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $611.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $46.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $33.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $24.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $45.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $43.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.0M | $42.6M |
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 79.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | 79.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 80.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 80.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 80.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | 82.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | $401.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $3.7B |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $6.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | $401.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | $540.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | $489.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $337.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $411.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $746.0M | $282.2M |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $753.0M | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0B | $4.1B |
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.27× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | $327.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | $318.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | 33.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $327.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $251.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $200.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $271.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $265.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $228.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $164.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-290.0M | $212.3M |
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | $318.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $234.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $184.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $262.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $257.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $220.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | $160.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-392.0M | $198.1M |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 33.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | 34.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 34.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 31.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | 24.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.8% | 32.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | 7.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 75.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.82× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | 3.75× | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.37× | 4.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
DDOG
| North America | $678.7M | 71% |
| International | $274.5M | 29% |
